arXiv AI By Adriana Laurindo Monteiro, Nayse Fagundes, Gabriel Mattos Langeloh, Gustavo de Oliveira Kanno, Priscila Louise Aguirre, Thiago Costa Rizuti da Rocha, Victor Leme Beltran

OptiAgent: End-to-End Optimization Modeling via Multi-Agent Iterative Refinement

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 05346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose OptiAgent, a multi-agent framework that, given a natural language description of an Operations Research problem, is able to output a solver-ready mathematical formulation as well as executable code.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

Opti-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking End-to-End Optimization R&D Agents on Real-World Business Problems

arXiv:2607. 10768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed to solve optimization problems, yet existing benchmarks evaluate them on pre-structured mathematical formulations that bypass the most critical challenge: translating complex business requirements into correct models and solve efficiently.

By Yongchang Fu, Xinjie Huang, Chengjun Dai, Chengzhe Feng, Junshao Zhang, Hong Zhu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

MIRROR: A Multi-Agent Framework with Iterative Adaptive Revision and Hierarchical Retrieval for Optimization Modeling in Operations Research

arXiv:2602.03318v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Operations Research (OR) relies on expert-driven modeling--a slow and fragile process ill-suited to novel scenarios. While large language models (L...

By Yifan Shi, Jiayi Wang, Minyi Wu, Ye Fan, Jialong Shi, Jianyong Sun
arXiv AI
3d ago

Right Answers, Costly Models: The Efficiency Gap in LLM-based Optimization Modeling

The paper introduces OptTips, a knowledge base of 50 expert optimization modeling techniques, and OptDachshund, a multi‑agent framework that generates mathematical models and solver code from natural‑language problem descriptions. Using these tools, the authors create the EfficientOpt benchmark, comprising 561 expert‑reviewed tasks with paired reference implementations, to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on both correctness and computational efficiency. Their experiments with 11 LLMs show a consistent efficiency gap: even when LLMs produce correct solutions, the resulting programs often take longer to solve than expert‑crafted counterparts, highlighting the need to assess both accuracy and runtime performance in LLM‑based optimization modeling.

By Zhong Li, Xin Huang, Jinhui Wan, Xiangyi Wang, Shenkai Zhang, Ruiqi Chen, Wenyu Liu, Zaiwen Wen, Ziyan Luo