arXiv AI By Zipei Yu, Yue-Jiao Gong, Zeyuan Ma, Yuncheng Jiang, Zhiguang Cao

Hyper Algorithm Design Agent: Evolving Learnable Optimizer from Zero

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces a dual‑agent framework that automates the evolution of Meta‑Black‑Box Optimization (MetaBBO) algorithms. By treating the design loop as a coding task, a task agent refines the MetaBBO codebase while a hyper agent continually modifies both agents, enabling recursive self‑improvement. The resulting evolved MetaBBO variants outperform current human‑crafted baselines and adapt quickly across different optimization domains, revealing emergent design principles.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 1

Self-Evolving Harness on Multiple Tasks with the Agent as Its Own Optimizer

The paper introduces a self‑evolving harness framework where a frozen language‑model agent first solves tasks and then edits its own harness based on run records. Using a 49‑line seed harness, the evolved harness improves average scores on in‑distribution benchmarks by 4.48 points and on out‑of‑distribution benchmarks by 12.64 points, surpassing Codex on the former and matching it on the latter. Continued evolution on a specific out‑of‑distribution benchmark further raises performance, and the study analyzes emergent mechanisms such as output truncation and history compaction.

By Qiankai Xu
arXiv AI
5d ago

A Closer Look at Agentic BBO: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Black-Box Optimization

The paper introduces AgenticBBO-Bench, a cross‑domain benchmark for evaluating large language model agents on black‑box optimization tasks such as synthetic functions, hyperparameter tuning, database tuning, chip design, and molecular design. Experiments show that agentic BBO outperforms direct LLM‑based methods in all five domains and beats the best numerical optimizers in four. The study also analyzes the impact of optimization tools, task semantics, prior knowledge, and the LLM’s role, finding that numerical tools are not consistently helpful, task semantics are broadly useful, and numerical optimizers can capitalize on agent‑generated search trajectories.

By Ming Chen, Rong-Xi Tan, Ke Xue, Yu-Jie Zhou, Taiye Lu, Zhi-Xuan Gao, Peng Xie, Zijun Shen, Chen Lu, Haopu Shang, Chao Qian