arXiv AI By Atul Kabra, Prakhar Paliwal, Manjesh K. Hanawal

Operationalizing Cyber Threat Intelligence with GraphRAG

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 13050v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a security researcher publishes a report on a cyberattack, detection engineers are supposed to turn it into working detection rules.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Evidence-Grounded Retrieval for Investigation Hunt Lead Generation from CTI Reports

The paper introduces AHLERT, a system that automatically extracts environment-aware hunt leads from Cyber Threat Intelligence reports. It combines a hybrid retriever—dense vector search plus multi-hop knowledge‑graph traversal seeded with MITRE ATT&CK—with ontology‑grounded retrieval‑augmented generation to constrain leads to a defender’s assets. Evaluations on public CTI reports show that AHLERT doubles mean F1 scores and achieves an effectiveness score of ~86.95% compared to off‑the‑shelf LLM models.

By Akash Prakash, Boubakr Nour, Makan Pourzandi, Chadi Assi, Mourad Debbabi
arXiv AI
Jul 28

TRACE-CTI: Auditable Post-Extraction Governance of TTP Claims with Knowledge Graphs

arXiv:2607. 24563v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Security Operations Centers increasingly rely on automated mapping of Cyber Threat Intelligence reports to MITRE ATT&CK, yet extractor outputs remain fallible and are often stored without the evidence, provenance, and validation history needed to decide whether an individual mapping should be trusted.

By Federico Valletta, Giacomo Longo, Enrico Russo, Alessio Merlo
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Ranked by the Matcher: A Reproducibility Audit of Knowledge Graph Extraction from Threat Reports

The paper audits the reproducibility of knowledge‑graph extraction from threat reports by re‑implementing matching rules for only five of twelve systems and re‑scoring ten system outputs under eight protocols. The audit shows that different matching protocols can reverse most pairwise system rankings and that a fixed prediction set can vary from 0.16 to 0.70 F1. The authors also build CTIForge to isolate validation effects, finding that validation changes precision across backbones and increases entity‑type disputes, and they release the full pipeline, protocol suite, and audit records.

By Safayat Bin Hakim, Houbing Herbert Song