arXiv:2610.09371v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Calibrated uncertainty quantification is essential to ensuring AI agents are trustworthy and reliable. However, when agents seek to maximize user eng...
By Raghu Arghal, Saswati Sarkar, Shirin Saeedi Bidokhti
arXiv:2610.18780v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model multi-agent systems extend individual agents' capabilities through collaboration across specialized roles, tools, and workflows. Y...
By Xiaoguang Guo, Yaohao Long, Chuxu Zhang
The paper introduces DISCERN, a two-tier protocol for certifying that updates to production models do not increase risk. It first uses unlabeled data to detect benign updates based on disagreement rates, then selectively labels only disagreements through an anytime-valid confidence sequence. The method achieves finite-sample validity with label-complexity bounds of order ρ²/ε², demonstrating significant label savings and strong empirical performance across 14,000+ audit streams.
By Vishnu Bindu Balachandran
arXiv:2609.15319v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Frontier models score well on shallow document/chart reading tasks. In a controlled data-room audit, moving evidence into buried conditions reduced a...
By Luis M. S\'anchez
arXiv:2609.15122v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Generative CAD models are expected to remain behaviorally correct after parameter edits, so increasing the number of edit checks is often treated as...
By Hongye Yang, Zhihao Xie, Shengjun Xiong, Boxiao Huang
The paper introduces a hypothesis testing framework for adaptive auditing of AI systems, addressing the challenge of limited, opportunistically collected data. It defines two competing null hypotheses—one from the model’s perspective and one from the auditor’s—and uses Safe Anytime-Valid Inference (SAVI) to perform betting-based tests that yield simultaneous e-processes. The authors prove that, with a powerful auditor, the two hypotheses become asymptotically inverse, allowing a global robustness certification, and demonstrate empirically that their methods control Type‑I error and can reach conclusions with as few as 20 observations.
By Siyu Zhou, Patrick Vossler, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Yifan Mai, Jean Feng