arXiv Machine Learning By Koen van der Blom, Diederick Vermetten

On the Influence of the Feature Computation Budget on Per-Instance Algorithm Selection for Black-Box Optimization

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 04954v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Per-instance algorithm selection (PIAS) takes advantage of complementarity between a set of algorithms by deciding which algorithm to run on a given instance.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Are Coreset Selection Methods Worth Their Cost?

The paper evaluates coreset selection methods by incorporating both selection and training time into a unified wall‑clock budget, using a standardized benchmark across four datasets and multiple selectors. Across numerous budget anchors, simple random or full‑data training consistently outperforms sophisticated selectors, and selection costs are dominated by a full‑dataset scan that cannot be amortized. The study also identifies when subset reuse can justify selection and reports several correctness fixes in a popular codebase.

By Yangze Liu, Zhongyi Han
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Designing Agentic AI Workflow Portfolios under Imperfect Selection and Compute Cost

The paper investigates how to design portfolios of agentic AI workflows that vary in reasoning strategy, verification structure, and compute cost. It proposes a portfolio-and-selector framework where multiple workflow executions are run and the best output is chosen, balancing additional compute with potential gains in accuracy. The authors develop exact and approximate optimization methods, evaluate them on three datasets, and show modest improvements over the best single workflow.

By Mojtaba Abdolmaleki, Stefanus Jasin, Boyu Wang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

FrontierOR: Benchmarking LLMs' Capacity for Efficient Algorithm Design in Large-Scale Optimization

arXiv:2605. 25246v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for optimization modeling and solver-code generation, yet practical operations research and optimization problems often require a harder capability: designing scalable algorithms that exploit problem structure and outperform direct formulation-and-solve baselines.

By Minwei Kong, Chonghe Jiang, Ao Qu, Wenbin Ouyang, Zhaoming Zeng, Xiaotong Guo, Zhekai Li, Junyi Li, Yi Fan, Xinshou Zheng, Xi Jing, Yikai Zhang, Zhiwei Liang, Seonghoo Kim, Runqing Yang, Zijian Zhou, Sirui Li, Han Zheng, Wangyang Ying, Ou Zheng, Chonghuan Wang, Jinglong Zhao, Hanzhang Qin, Cathy Wu, Paul Pu Liang, Jinhua Zhao, Hai Wang
arXiv AI
2d ago

OR for AI That Does OR: Routing LLMs up the Escalator inside the OSCAR Framework

The paper introduces OSCAR, an LLM‑based framework that translates business descriptions into accurate optimization models while verifying and improving them through a simulator, coder, and reviewer. OSCAR uses a cost‑ordered escalation strategy to select among LLMs of varying price and capability, achieving 95–100% accuracy on benchmark problems with local, open‑weight models. The framework also provides competitive guarantees and token‑cost advantages over existing LLMs like Codex and Claude Code.

By Jinzhi Bu, Haixin Tang, Huanan Zhang