arXiv Machine Learning By Antonio Mone, Zuzanna Osika, Florian Felten, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah, Mark Fuge, Frans A. Oliehoek, Luciano Cavalcante Siebert

Objective-Behavior Alignment: Diagnostics for MORL Policy Selection

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a diagnostic workflow for multi‑objective reinforcement learning (MORL) that reveals behavioral differences among policies on the Pareto front, which are not apparent from value vectors alone. It offers quantitative and visual tools to inspect these variations and demonstrates their effectiveness on both simple grid tasks and more complex continuous‑control benchmarks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 28

Preference-Guided Cooperation in Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces Meta-Gradient Informed Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MIRL), a framework that leverages the structure of multiple objectives to enhance cooperation among agents. By formulating MOMARL at both team and individual levels and using objective-wise counterfactual credit assignment, MIRL allows agents to learn how to prioritize objectives individually while jointly optimizing a system-level objective. Experiments on a multi-objective particle environment demonstrate that MIRL, especially its dynamic variant, improves Pareto-front quality compared to baseline methods.

By Qiyue Xia, J. Michael Herrmann