Multi-Objective Preference Optimization: Improving Human Alignment of Generative Models
arXiv:2505. 10892v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-training LLMs with RLHF and preference optimization methods (e.
arXiv:2505. 10892v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-training LLMs with RLHF and preference optimization methods (e.
arXiv:2607. 29559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function.
arXiv:2602. 07764v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) seeks to train agents capable of balancing conflicting objectives.
UniPolicy is a unified objective‑specific policy framework for search advertising that jointly optimizes relevance, click propensity, and commercial value. It uses objective‑aware prefix tokens, sparse MoE‑LoRA routing, and residual FFNs to decouple parameters within a shared backbone, and constructs pairwise preferences from multi‑stage behavioral feedback to strengthen clicked candidates. In large‑scale offline tests and a 7‑day online A/B test, UniPolicy improves CTR by 0.71%, RPS by 1.58%, and advertising revenue by 1.32% while keeping serving latency stable.
arXiv:2506. 13702v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Single-trajectory preference optimization methods learn from datasets of ((prompt, response, reward)) tuples, offering a practical alternative to pairwise preference learning by directly leveraging scalar feedback.
UniPolicy is a multi-policy alignment framework for search advertising that jointly optimizes relevance, click propensity, and commercial value. It uses objective-specific prefix tokens, sparse MoE-LoRA routing, and residual FFNs to decouple parameters within a shared backbone, and builds pairwise preferences from multi-stage behavioral feedback to improve generation. In large-scale offline tests and a 7‑day online A/B test, UniPolicy achieved balanced gains across metrics, boosting CTR by 0.71%, RPS by 1.58%, and revenue by 1.32% while keeping latency stable.
arXiv:2512.10237v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback has emerged as a standard for aligning diffusion models. However, we identify a fundamental limitation i...
arXiv:2606. 04807v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mitigating social bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a distinct alignment challenge: unlike verifiable tasks, bias lacks a single ground truth, creating a high-variance, subjective reward landscape.
The paper introduces a diagnostic workflow for multi‑objective reinforcement learning (MORL) that reveals behavioral differences among policies on the Pareto front, which are not apparent from value vectors alone. It offers quantitative and visual tools to inspect these variations and demonstrates their effectiveness on both simple grid tasks and more complex continuous‑control benchmarks.
arXiv:2609.14648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning multi-turn dialogue agents is usually framed as matching turn-level human preferences, yet direct optimization of long-term outcomes is often...
arXiv:2608. 08604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a powerful framework for solving complex collaborative tasks, but it relies heavily on well-defined global reward functions.
The paper introduces Meta-Gradient Informed Multi-Objective Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MIRL), a framework that leverages the structure of multiple objectives to enhance cooperation among agents. By formulating MOMARL at both team and individual levels and using objective-wise counterfactual credit assignment, MIRL allows agents to learn how to prioritize objectives individually while jointly optimizing a system-level objective. Experiments on a multi-objective particle environment demonstrate that MIRL, especially its dynamic variant, improves Pareto-front quality compared to baseline methods.