arXiv Machine Learning July 14, 2026 By Maxime Heuillet, Ola Ahmad, Audrey Durand

Neural Active Learning Meets the Partial Monitoring Framework

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2405. 08921v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We focus on the online-based active learning (OAL) setting where an agent operates over a stream of observations and trades-off between the costly acquisition of information (labelled observations) and the cost of prediction errors.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisition

arXiv:2510. 12624v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Active feature acquisition (AFA) is a sequential decision-making problem where the goal is to improve model performance for test instances by adaptively selecting which features to acquire.

By Yuta Kobayashi, Zilin Jing, Jiayu Yao, Hongseok Namkoong, Shalmali Joshi

agents benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 14

Randomized Confidence Bounds for Stochastic Partial Monitoring

arXiv:2402. 05002v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The partial monitoring (PM) framework provides a theoretical formulation of sequential learning problems with incomplete feedback.

By Maxime Heuillet, Ola Ahmad, Audrey Durand

agents benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Jul 21

Implicit Actor Critic Coupling via a Supervised Learning Framework for RLVR

arXiv:2509. 02522v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have empowered large language models (LLMs) to tackle challenging reasoning tasks such as mathematics and programming, however existing RLVR methods often suffer from sparse reward signals and unstable policy gradient updates inherent to RL-based approaches.

By Jiaming Li, Longze Chen, Ze Gong, Yukun Chen, Lu Wang, Wanwei He, Run Luo, Min Yang

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 16

On the Role of Computation in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2602. 05999v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How does the amount of compute available to a reinforcement learning (RL) policy affect its learning?

By Raj Ghugare, Micha{\l} Bortkiewicz, Alicja Ziarko, Benjamin Eysenbach

reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jul 28

Label-free Industrial Fault Detection via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A System for Run-to-Failure Prognostics

arXiv:2607. 22987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machinery fault detection (MFD) remains heavily reliant on supervised learning, which struggles with the scarcity of fault labels in real-world settings.

By Dhiraj Neupane, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Richard Dazeley, Sunil Aryal

reinforcement-learning benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 14

Active Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2607. 11720v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables effective policies to be trained from large, previously collected datasets and subsequently improved through limited online interaction.

By Alper Kamil Bozkurt, Shangtong Zhang, Yuichi Motai

reinforcement-learning fine-tuning

Related stories

Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisition

Randomized Confidence Bounds for Stochastic Partial Monitoring

Implicit Actor Critic Coupling via a Supervised Learning Framework for RLVR

On the Role of Computation in Reinforcement Learning

Label-free Industrial Fault Detection via Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A System for Run-to-Failure Prognostics

Active Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning