arXiv Computation and Language By NeoHorse Team, Guoliang Cao, Guohao Dai, Tianyu Guo, Kai Han, Hailin Hu, Zihan Jiang, Xiang Kuang, Boxun Li, Yulong Li, Zehua Pei, Yuchuan Tian, Jiamin Wang, Yu Wang, Yunhe Wang, Yihong Wu, Haiyang Xu, Shuo Zhang, Hang Zhou, Siyang Cheng, Jiayu Fan, Wei He, Qingrui Jiao, Hongguang Li, Zhiyuan Li, Runke Liu, Xi Liu, Xinchen Liu, Sinno Jialin Pan, Yi Ren, Liuyang Song, Chenyu Wang, Bei Yu, Quanlu Zhang, Xiangyu Zhang, Mengyu Zheng, Yingjie Zong

NeoHorse-1: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement via Agentic Post-Training with Routing Harness

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

NeoHorse-1 is a family of agent-native models that pursue recursive self‑improvement through agentic post‑training. The system uses a heterogeneous model pool with intelligent routing to record capability demands, service tiers, and interactions, converting these records into training examples that preserve reasoning, tool calls, and harness context. By structuring supervised fine‑tuning into a three‑stage curriculum and employing routing‑guided on‑policy distillation, NeoHorse-1 closes an evaluation‑selection‑update loop, raising macro‑average performance from 58.94 to 64.87 on 4B models and from 65.60 to 69.04 on 9B models across eleven benchmarks, while also producing a prefill‑only variant that outputs structured decisions and probabilities for agent workflows.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Oct 9

Recursive Self-Improvement through Multi-Agent Self-Supervision

The paper introduces Multi-Agent Self-Supervision (MASS), a recursive self‑improvement technique that alternates between evolutionary workflow optimization and supervised fine‑tuning on self‑generated multi‑agent trajectories. MASS enables a single base model to iteratively propose, execute, and self‑evaluate complex multi‑agent workflows, discovering effective roles and information routing. Experiments with Qwen3.6‑27B show 1.2–1.6× higher performance per output token on four open‑ended benchmarks, and student models trained on MASS traces outperform single‑agent students trained on 1.4× more tokens.

By Hyunin Lee, Jinglue Xu, Jeffrey Seely, Donghyun Lee, Somayeh Sojoudi, Matei Zaharia, Yujin Tang
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Agentick: A Unified Benchmark for General Sequential Decision-Making Agents

Agentick is a unified benchmark for sequential decision‑making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents on 37 procedurally generated tasks across six capability categories, four difficulty levels, and five observation modalities via a single Gymnasium‑compatible interface. It includes a Coding API, oracle reference policies, pre‑built SFT datasets, a composable agent harness, and a live leaderboard. An evaluation of 27 configurations and over 90,000 episodes shows no single approach dominates, with GPT‑5 mini leading overall, PPO excelling in planning and multi‑agent tasks, and the reasoning harness boosting LLM performance by 3‑10×, while ASCII observations outperform natural language.

By Roger Creus Castanyer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Glen Berseth
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 18

Connect the Dots: Training LLMs for Long-Lifecycle Agents with Cross-Domain Generalization Via Reinforcement Learning

This work presents a general framework for training large language models (LLMs) to "Connect the Dots" (CoD), a meta-capability required by long-lifecycle agents: as an LLM-based AI agent gets deployed in an environment, it solves a long sequence of tasks while continuously exploring the environment, learning from its own experiences, and iteratively self-updating its context about the environment, thereby achieving progressively better performance on future tasks conditioned on the updated context. Major components of the CoD framework include: (1) algorithm design and infrastructure for end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) with long rollout sequences interleaving solve-task and update-context episodes; (2) tasks and environments for incentivizing and eliciting the targeted meta-capability in LLMs during training, as well as for faithfully measuring progress during evaluation.