arXiv:2606. 21875v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern data analysis usually gives a prediction without showing whether the evidence behind it is clear, conflicting, or stable.
By Jeffery Opoku, David Banahene
arXiv:2606. 03031v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structured financial audit verification is difficult for language-model agents because correctness depends on structured evidence rather than text alone.
By Yan Wang, Xuguang Ai, Jaisal Patel, Xueqing Peng, Fengran Mo, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Mingyu Cao, Lingfei Qian, V\'ictor Guti\'errez-Basulto
arXiv:2608. 13706v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing defenses against hallucination in retrieval-augmented and multi-agent pipelines remain partial: evidence is trusted despite modality disagreement, debate verifies an aggregate report rather than individual claims, and such verification occurs only after drafting, leaving inter-agent errors undetected until the final text.
By Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Mukaffi Bin Moin, Jubayer Al Mahmud, M. F. Mridha, Md. Alam Hossain
arXiv:2606. 19501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized finance exposes supervisors to fast-moving, networked credit risks.
By Aijie Shu, Bowei Chen, Wenbin Wu, Cathy Yi-Hsuan Chen, Fengxiang He
arXiv:2607. 11141v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) based agents are beginning to participate in portfolio construction and market analysis, where decisions must be justified under evolving information and risk constraints.
By Changlun Li, Peixian Ma, Qiqi Duan, Zhenyu Lin, Peineng Wu
Large language models (LLMs) can synthesize financial narratives but may express high confidence when evidence is sparse, stale, or contradictory. This failure is especially consequential in forecasting, where filings, news, prices, volume, and technical signals can disagree.