arXiv:2604.01151v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As LLM agents are increasingly deployed in multi-agent systems, they introduce risks of covert coordination that may evade standard forms of human...
By Aaron Rose, Carissa Cullen, Sahar Abdelnabi, Philip Torr, Brandon Gary Kaplowitz, Christian Schroeder de Witt
arXiv:2608. 02698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed not by a single operator but by many, side by side on shared infrastructure.
By Mohamed Chahine Ghanem
arXiv:2605.27593v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Even when a tool is explicitly described as unfair and harmful to others, ostensibly safety-aligned LLM agents still voluntarily engage in secret c...
By Xijie Zeng, Frank Rudzicz
arXiv:2606. 28425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Increasingly autonomous agentic AI systems pose novel multi-agent risks, such as secret collusion via covert communication channels.
By Jimmy Laurence Rippin, Simon C. Marshall, David Demitri Africa, Christian Schroeder de Witt
arXiv:2605.27068v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Mo...
By Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li, Zeyu Li, Haochen Liu, Xiangyu Kong, Changjiang Han, Yonghan Yang, Zichen Zhao, Zixuan Dong, Fuyuan Lyu, Bowei He, Haolun Wu, Jikun Kang, Xue Liu
The paper introduces Verifiable Latent Alignments (VLA), a framework that monitors and steers hidden communication channels between language‑model agents. VLA links private latent states to public actions via event identifiers, enabling causal analysis. Experiments on a multi‑agent auction benchmark show high detection accuracy and effective mitigation of collusion, even without training on attack examples.
By Ramneet Kaur, Pradyumna Chari, Ramesh Raskar, Jugad Singh, Sumit Kumar Jha, Anirban Roy