Sci‑MMR is a new benchmark for multi‑step evidence‑grounded scientific reasoning in multimodal agents, featuring 235 multi‑hop tasks across four disciplines and an average of nine figure panels per task. It evaluates not just final answer accuracy but also the recovery of structured evidence from scientific claims, citations, visual data, and supporting regions. Experiments on eight state‑of‑the‑art models show a gap of over 20 points between answer accuracy and complete evidence recovery, highlighting significant challenges in evidence acquisition and integration.
By Jiaqiang Li, Yajie Yang, Zhiheng Xi, Jiadong Chen, Enyu Zhou, Senjie Jin, Yang Nan, Jiazheng Zhang, Han Wang, Yanxin Li, Dingwei Zhu, Bicheng Deng, Yuhui Wang, Xiang Zheng, Qi Zhang, Lei Bai, Xingjun Ma, Tao Gui
arXiv:2605. 29861v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced autonomous agents from deep search, which retrieves concise factual answers, to deep research, which synthesizes scattered evidence into long-form reports.
By Chenghao Zhang, Guanting Dong, Yufan Liu, Tong Zhao, Xiaoxi Li, Zhicheng Dou
The paper introduces Video‑Centered Deep Research Report Generation, a new benchmark that evaluates agents on their ability to generate long, interactive research reports from a source video and user request. It presents the OmniDR‑Bench dataset with 50 tasks in Chinese and English, 19 subcategories, and 6,414 criteria, and proposes Omni Atomic Rubric Trees (Omni‑ARTs) for evaluation across audiovisual grounding, multimodal evidence use, and interactive presentation. The authors also detail a skill‑based workflow, an automated rubric construction process, and report that current agents achieve a best score of 63.3/100, highlighting gaps in content coverage, causal analysis, and citation accuracy.
By Jiahao Meng, Qize Yang, Yuxuan Wang, Yunfei Chu, Wensi Dai, Jin Xu, Yunhai Tong
arXiv:2608.29088v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal question answering remains sensitive to noisy, incomplete, and weakly grounded evidence. Long unstructured contexts can introduce redundancy...
By Zafar Ali, Asad Khan, Nimbeshaho Thierry, Nabila Amir, Adam A. Q. Mohammed, Pavlos Kefalas
OneSearch‑VL is a unified multimodal deep research agent that handles single‑image, multi‑image, and video tasks by leveraging a Visually Grounded Evidence Graph (VGEG) to encode dependencies among visual anchors, entity relations, facts, and answer‑producing operations. The VGEG‑based data engine builds and verifies questions, filters expert trajectories, and supports supervised fine‑tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) with the Evidence‑aware Visual‑Grounded Rubric reward (EVGR). Experiments demonstrate that OneSearch‑VL‑8B outperforms Qwen3‑VL‑8B with tool access by 20.2 and 17.6 percentage points on new multimodal benchmarks, while also achieving significant gains across seven image benchmarks and VideoDR.
By Hongyu Li, Manyuan Zhang, Kaituo Feng, Shu Chen, Dian Zheng, Hao Li, Hao Yu, Zhangquan Chen, Zoey Guo, Ray Zhang, Shaofei Huang, Tianrui Hui, Linjiang Huang, Si Liu
Deep Research Bench II is a new benchmark designed to evaluate Deep Research Agents (DRAs) by requiring them to produce research reports for 132 grounded tasks across 22 domains. Each report is assessed using 9,430 fine‑grained binary rubrics that cover information recall, analysis, and presentation, all derived from expert‑written investigative articles through a rigorous LLM‑plus‑human pipeline. Evaluation of current state‑of‑the‑art DRAs shows that even the best models satisfy fewer than 50% of these rubrics, highlighting a significant gap between automated agents and human experts.
By Ruizhe Li, Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Xiaorui Wang, Zhendong Mao