arXiv Machine Learning By Yanli Yan, Yuanzheng Li, Yong Zhao, Hongbo Guo, Shoudong Han

More Data, Worse Decisions? Preference Reversals in Neural Networks under Gram Incompatibility

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural networks increasingly combine data across populations, time periods, and operating conditions to improve generalization.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 10

Is Fairness Truly Fair? Towards Reliable Lipschitz Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Fixed-\texorpdfstring{$\delta$}{delta} Alignment

arXiv:2606. 10632v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lipschitz-style individual fairness formalizes the idea that semantically similar examples should receive similar predictions, but its evaluation in multi-task learning (MTL) can be confounded by method-induced representation scales.

By Junbo Ding, Xin Zang, Chenchen Pan, Donghao Song, Jiaxin Zhu, Danhuai Guo
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 22

The Quadrilateral Loss: Additivity as a Measurable Behavior of Dense Neural Networks

Additive models buy interpretability by forbidding feature interactions, a constraint that neural instantiations enforce architecturally. We introduce the quadrilateral loss, a differentiable penalty that treats additivity as a measurable behavior instead: a second-order mixed difference on pairs of training points swapping one coordinate, which vanishes if and only if the coordinate carries no interaction, remains informative for piecewise-linear networks, and equals in expectation the per-coordinate interaction mass of the interventional Shapley-GAM.