arXiv Machine Learning By Jing Xu, Christopher Kanan

More Data Cannot Break a Symmetry: Identifiability by Design

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper shows that unsupervised representational alignment can fail due to symmetry in the stimulus geometry, even before data are collected. By using a design-time diagnostic based on the automorphism group of the geometry, the authors demonstrate that dense sampling can create near-duplicates that make alignment degenerate. Applying this diagnostic to a colour design reduces catastrophic alignment failures from 75% to 2% without altering models, layers, or solvers.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 8

Geometric Stability: The Missing Axis of Representations

arXiv:2601. 09173v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Representational similarity analysis and related methods compare the internal geometries of neural networks, but they measure only alignment between spaces, leaving a blind spot -- whether a representation's structure is reliably recoverable, not merely similar.

By Prashant C. Raju
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

Consistency Has a Computable Blind Spot: A Commutation Theory of Label-Free Reliability for Vision-Language Figure Reading

Label-free reliability for vision-language models rests on invariance: perturb the input and a faithful reader's answer should not change. This has a known blind spot, a systematic misreading survives the perturbation and gets certified wrong, which we show is computable, not just real: an error is invisible to an edit exactly when the two commute, so the errors a suite cannot reach form its joint centralizer, a set that shrinks as edits are added and can be written down rather than guessed at.