arXiv:2505. 12343v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the impressive capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), they remain susceptible to hallucinations, where generated content is inconsistent with the input image.
By Kai Tang, Jinhao You, Yichen Guo, Yiding Sun, Dongxu Zhang, Wenya Wang, Hanze Li, Tao Luo, Renyuan Li, Xiande Huang
The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.
By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan
arXiv:2609.36440v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress across multimodal tasks, yet object hallucination remains a persistent...
By Jae-Ho Lee, Jeong-Eun Lee, Gyeong-Moon Park
In 2026, we held the fourth iteration of the SHROOM Shared Task series: SHROOM-Visions (\textbf{S}hared-task on \textbf{H}allucinations and \textbf{R}elated \textbf{O}bservable \textbf{O}vergeneration...
arXiv:2607. 12752v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While recent advances in 3D generation have enabled impressive visual synthesis, existing methods often rely on 2D diffusion supervision without explicit mechanisms for geometric consistency, leading to spatial hallucinations such as duplicated structures and misaligned geometry.
By Hongbo Wang, Huaibo Huang, Jie Cao, Jin Liu, Haoyang Tong, Ran He
arXiv:2603. 21693v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings.
By Mohammad Asadi, Tahoura Nedaee, Jack W. O'Sullivan, Euan Ashley, Ehsan Adeli