arXiv Computer Vision
DreamRealm: Exploring and Materializing Hallucination Worlds for Trustworthy Vision-Language Models
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago
DreamRealm: Exploring and Materializing Hallucination Worlds for Trustworthy Vision-Language Models
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) remain prone to visual hallucinations when correct responses depend on subtle visual details. One line of post-training methods constructs visual contrasts thr...
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30
DARE to Mitigate Hallucination: Dual-path Auto-Regressive-aware Editing
arXiv:2609.36440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress across multimodal tasks, yet object hallucination remains a persistent...
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations
The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
Same Attention, Different Truths: Put Logit-Lens over Visual Attention to Detect and Mitigate LVLM Object Hallucination
arXiv:2608. 07302v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, generating objects that are absent from the image.
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3
Does Playing it Safe Count as Faithfulness? Reassessing LVLM Hallucination Mitigation Methods
The paper examines six inference-time hallucination mitigation methods applied to three large vision-language models across four benchmarks, including MMStar. It finds that reducing hallucination rates often comes at the cost of lower informativeness—such as decreased object recall, visual coverage, and response detail—and that gains on hallucination benchmarks do not consistently translate to improved performance on fine-grained perception and reasoning tasks. The authors argue that current evaluation protocols may overstate progress by favoring conservative generation, and propose that hallucination mitigation should be assessed as a trade-off among faithfulness, informativeness, and overall capability.
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 8
Dual-Pathway Circuits of Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2605.13156v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in bridging visual perception and natural language understanding, enabling...