arXiv:2608.21402v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: World action models (WAMs) jointly denoise future video frames and robot actions, and the video prior is expected to generalize their control. Camera...
By Bingqi Huang, Bingchuan Wei, Yingkai Cai, Zhaokui Wang
arXiv:2605. 21862v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Chunked vision-language-action (VLA) policies predict multi-step robot controls, conditioning each update on the current visual observation alone.
By Chushan Zhang, Ruihan Lu, Jinguang Tong, Xuesong Li, Yikai Wang, Hongdong Li
The paper introduces RePlanMem-VLA, a selective visual memory system for Vision‑Language‑Action models that uses a policy’s own plan revisions as an online memory‑write signal. By detecting unusually large disagreements between temporally aligned action predictions, the method identifies task‑relevant events and updates a bounded visual memory while suppressing redundant frames. Experiments on MIKASA‑Robo‑VLA tasks and real‑robot replay data show that RePlanMem‑VLA retains essential observations in every episode and achieves high ROC‑AUC scores for event detection.
By Victoria Smelova, Daniil Kazachkov, Georgiy Kazantsev, Iuliia Tsvetkova, Egor Cherepanov, Nikita Kachaev, Artem Latyshev, Aleksandr I. Panov, Alexey K. Kovalev
ForeAct3D is a framework that grounds future world modeling in Vision‑Language‑Action policies by decoding depth, semantic segmentation, and camera pose from policy representations into current and future 3D scene states. The future queries are conditioned on the policy‑generated action chunk, and a physical‑consistency closure enforces background staticity, instance‑level rigidity, and wrist‑camera pose alignment with end‑effector kinematics. This approach eliminates the need for future prediction at inference and achieves high success rates on LIBERO and CALVIN, outperforming the base policy across all suites.
By Zhe Tao, Feiran Wang, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Yan Yan
The study examines how different vision‑language‑action (VLA) policies execute a manipulation task by comparing the geometry of their end‑effectors across 15,000 closed‑loop LIBERO rollouts. By pairing 3,600 configuration‑matched policy executions, the authors find that when both policies succeed, their end‑effector trajectories are much closer (median DTW distance 0.0120 m) than when only one succeeds (0.0380 m), a pattern consistent across all tasks, policy pairs, and nine representations. Even successful executions remain as far from same‑task demonstrations as the demonstrations are from each other, indicating that task‑associated geometry, rather than training data overlap, drives these differences.
By Xingyu Lin, Zhuang Li, Zhongrun Wu, Shouquan Zhou, Dehui Du
arXiv:2610.02323v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Flow-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies generate action chunks by transporting samples from a task-agnostic isotropic Gaussian source. As th...
By Jie He, Wei Li, Junwen Tong, Rui Shao, Wei-Shi Zheng, Liqiang Nie