The paper introduces the Communication Map, a method that charts every potential communication channel in a transformer model using only its weights. It generalizes previous coupling metrics into a single coefficient covering all 18 connection classes, revealing that 70‑89% of head pairs are non‑randomly oriented and identifying strong or avoiding couplings. The authors demonstrate the map’s utility by recovering known induction circuits and uncovering a two‑dimensional stream subspace whose removal eliminates induction capabilities across several models.
By Richard Zhe Wang
arXiv:2606. 19150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The remarkable success of Transformer-based models in natural language processing stems from architectural scaling, which leads to a large number of parameters and hinders deployment in resource-constrained environments.
By Yaniv Livertovsky, Shahar Somin, Gonen Singer
arXiv:2601.06787v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to contain significant redundancy, yet a systematic explanation for why certain components, particularly in...
By Jaewon Sok, Jewon Yeom, Seonghyeon Park, Jeongjae Park, Taesup Kim
arXiv:2607. 01940v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mechanistic interpretability often relies on component-level interventions to discover how a model produces a behavior.
By Zhiren Gong, Zihao Zeng, Chau Yuen, Wei Yang Bryan Lim
The paper investigates how knowledge distillation affects the internal mechanisms of language models by comparing GPT‑2 with its six‑layer student, DistilGPT‑2. Using techniques such as linear CKA, logit lens analysis, and attention pattern decomposition, the authors examine two circuits: Indirect Object Identification (IOI) and Greater‑Than (GT). They find that the IOI circuit collapses completely in the distilled model, whereas the GT circuit largely survives, with the student’s layer‑4 head effectively remapping the teacher’s layer‑9 comparison head, achieving 87.7% of the original task performance.
By Nabeelah Faumi, Deshan Sumanathilaka
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are commonly used to interpret large language models, but their reliability after pruning is unclear. This study shows that pruning’s effect on an SAE is governed by perturbation energy, a covariance-weighted norm, and that magnitude pruning distorts the representation space by ignoring activation geometry. Activation-aware pruning methods such as Wanda and SparseGPT better preserve SAE behavior, and the authors find that middle layers are especially vulnerable, leading them to propose a layer‑wise sparsity allocation that reduces perplexity for a given sparsity level.
By Suchit Gupte, Xueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili