arXiv AI By Sinjini Banerjee, Tim Marrinan, Anand D. Sarwate

Measuring consistency via ensemble margin and local prediction variability: Auditing decision systems in the presence of predictive multiplicity

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces a new consistency criterion for auditing decision systems that combines ensemble margin with local prediction variability to address predictive multiplicity, or the Rashomon effect. It shows that finite ensembles converge to the expected model’s consistency score as ensemble size and sample count grow, and demonstrates that ensembling models from the Rashomon set reduces unchecked incorrect predictions while keeping diversions moderate. Experiments on transformer and fine‑tuned language models for NLP and tabular classification confirm the method’s effectiveness and stronger alignment with existing multiplicity metrics.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

Predicting Multi-View Rashomon Representation: Can We Learn Where Models Disagree?

The paper introduces the concept of Rashomon Representation, describing how different foundation models can encode the same input in substantially different ways, leading to representational disagreement. It proposes a lightweight predictor that, using a single model’s representation, estimates whether an input will align with or diverge from other models’ representations, based on consistent input-dependent patterns. Experiments across various models and datasets demonstrate that this disagreement is predictable and can be used for efficient reliability estimation of foundation models.

By Mingyue Ma, Zongbo Han, Changqing Zhang, Guangyu Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 1

AdaFuse: Adaptive Ensemble Decoding with Test-Time Scaling for LLMs

AdaFuse is an adaptive ensemble decoding framework for large language models that dynamically selects fusion units during generation. It uses an uncertainty-based criterion to decide when to ensemble, applying a diversity-aware scaling strategy in uncertain states while continuing direct generation when confident. Experiments on question answering, arithmetic reasoning, and machine translation show AdaFuse outperforms strong baselines with an average relative improvement of 6.88%.

By Chengming Cui, Tianxin Wei, Ziyi Chen, Ruizhong Qiu, Zhichen Zeng, Zhining Liu, Xuying Ning, Duo Zhou, Jingrui He
arXiv AI
Sep 30

Alignment Forecasting: Predicting Misalignment From Training Data

The paper introduces Alignment Forecasting, a method for predicting whether fine‑tuning a language model on a given dataset will increase specific alignment failures such as deception or sycophancy. It presents ALIGNMENTFORECASTBENCH, a benchmark of over 5,000 forecasting questions across many models, datasets, and failure modes, and shows that a simple forecasting scaffold using an LLM’s assessment of dataset bias can outperform baseline forecasters. The authors demonstrate that filtering out high‑risk training examples identified by the forecaster can improve alignment in multiple‑choice evaluations, though benefits in open‑ended conversations remain uncertain.

By Chen Yueh-Han, Bruce W. Lee, Ilia Sucholutsky, Tomek Korbak