arXiv AI By Yiling Wu

Map Users and Mapmakers: The Scope of Cognitive Attribution from Acquired Representations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes a framework for delineating how acquired representations expand a system’s cognitive repertoire without necessarily transferring the underlying capacities used to create them. It introduces a five-part attribution table—effective tracking, application of acquired structures, acquisition from explicit specifications, acquisition from identifying observations, and retention and reuse—to specify the limits of this enlargement. The framework is applied to examples such as Andrew Ng’s world‑model interpretation of Othello‑GPT and contemporary machine‑concept accounts, illustrating that even full application competence does not guarantee acquisition capacity and that acquiring a criterion from its description differs from finding it in examples.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 24

The Linear Representation Hypothesis Needs a Group Action

The paper argues that the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH) should not be treated as a single claim but as a family of claims differentiated by how representations are considered equivalent. It highlights that different equivalence notions preserve different structures, leading to metrics, probes, and interventions that may actually test distinct hypotheses. By formalizing these ideas with group actions, the authors provide a framework that clarifies how assumptions vary across metrics, reading points, and analysis stages, and they apply it to audit common representation quantities and recent interpretability analyses.

By Louie Hong Yao, Yuhao Li, Shengchao Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 31

When AI performs, what remains? An integrative review of generative AI and cognitive capital in individuals and organizations

The article reviews how generative AI influences the long‑term retention of knowledge, skills, and judgment—collectively termed cognitive capital—in both individuals and organizations. It identifies four mechanisms (substitution of practice, scaffolding and feedback, metacognitive calibration, and organizational aggregation) through which AI interaction can either deplete or enhance cognitive capital, and proposes seven evidence‑based principles and five design levers for organizations. The authors argue that cognitive capital provides a multilevel framework for governing AI adoption and call for longitudinal, multilevel research to test their propositions.

By Giuseppe Riva, Stefania La Rocca, Brenda K. Wiederhold, Andrea Gaggioli