arXiv:2606. 20055v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection has significant practical value for industrial and medical monitoring, as well as other critical domains.
By Youji Zhu, Hongbing Wang, Wenchao Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Xiangguang Xiong
arXiv:2603.02974v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: DINO models provide rich patch-level representations that have recently enabled strong performance in unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD). Most ex...
By Ertunc Erdil, Nico Schulthess, Guney Tombak, Ender Konukoglu
arXiv:2603. 26842v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) is essential for maintaining the reliability and security of IoT-enabled service systems.
By PengYu Chen, Shang Wan, Xiaohou Shi, Yuan Chang, Yan Sun, Sajal K. Das
arXiv:2602. 01359v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although recent studies on time-series anomaly detection have increasingly adopted ever-larger neural network architectures such as transformers and foundation models, they incur high computational costs and memory usage, making them impractical for real-time and resource-constrained scenarios.
By Jinju Park, Seokho Kang
The paper introduces an adaptive temporal modeling framework for weakly supervised video anomaly detection that addresses the limitations of rigid Multiple Instance Learning approaches. It presents a Temporal Refinement Module using dynamic positional encoding and a learnable class token to capture long‑range dependencies, and an Event Segmentation Module that identifies event boundaries via temporal discontinuity analysis to produce discriminative event‑level representations. An adaptive similarity‑based fusion strategy replaces fixed top‑k heuristics, dynamically integrating snippet‑level and event‑level anomaly scores into video‑level predictions, and the method outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines on two benchmarks.
By Changyi Li, Yu Xiao
The paper investigates how to adapt visualization techniques—such as saliency maps and Grad‑CAM—to convolutional‑recurrent neural networks (CNN+RNN) used for time‑series anomaly detection in video data. It combines VGG19 for feature extraction with a GRU for sequential analysis, noting that the TimeDistributed layer complicates gradient propagation and weakens the link between spatial and temporal information, thereby reducing the effectiveness of standard visualization methods. The authors propose adaptations of these techniques to better interpret models that incorporate a temporal dimension, highlighting both the challenges and the potential of extending static‑image interpretation strategies to temporal models.
By Fabien Poirier, Myriam Lamolle