arXiv:2607. 15380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electronic health records combine free-text clinical narratives with structured measurements such as vital signs, laboratory values, and comorbidities.
By Ajay Madhavan Ravichandran, Bilgin Osmandoja, Klemens Budde, Klaus Netter, Tobias Strapatsas, Aljoscha Burchardt, Sebastian M\"oller, Roland Roller
arXiv:2604. 05435v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Incomplete or inconsistent discharge documentation drives care fragmentation and avoidable readmissions.
By Akshat Dasula, Prasanna Desikan, Jaideep Srivastava, Shivali Dalmia, Abhishek Mukherji
arXiv:2606. 28798v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: ICD codes are central to reimbursement, research, and population health surveillance, yet automated coding systems often struggle to integrate diagnostic signals from both clinical narratives and structured electronic health record (EHR) variables.
By Chengyuan Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Yao Li, Guanting Chen
arXiv:2607. 15447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent research in clinical machine learning, focusing on outcome predictions in intensive care unit (ICU), has shifted from bespoke supervised models to foundation models, utilising modern representation learning methods.
By Jingteng Li, Alexander Capstick, Louise Rigny, Iona Biggart, Neil J Sebire, Payam Barnaghi
arXiv:2608. 16643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated detection of errors in clinical documentation is a promising application of large language models (LLMs), yet decisions to deploy such models rest on benchmarks that evaluate each clinical note in isolation.
By Yifan Zhang, Rahmatollah Beheshti
An end-to-end-trained vision-language model generates prostate biopsy reports in native languages, demonstrated in German. The system uses a tokenizer and model trained from scratch and an automated pipeline that splits composite reports into image-text pairs, producing 17,344 pairs from 2,402 cases without manual annotation. Evaluated on clinical attributes, it achieves 96.2% F1 for malignancy detection and 65.2% for Gleason grading, comparable to an FDA-cleared classifier and validated on external cohorts.
By Christian Grashei, Fabian G\"ulhan, Maximilian Legnar, Fabian St\"ogbauer, Cleo-Aron Weis, Carolin Mogler, Peter Sch\"uffler