arXiv AI By Lingyu Xiao, Zexin Feng, Xintao Yan

Long-term Traffic Simulation via Structured Autoregressive Modeling

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 31209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interactive traffic simulation is a vital world model for autonomous driving.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 4

SimSkill: A Lifelong Learning AI Agent for Autonomous Mastery of Traffic Simulation

SimSkill is a lifelong learning AI agent that uses the SUMO traffic simulator to autonomously identify gaps in its capabilities, generate and solve tasks grounded in the environment, and verify solutions through an action‑critic loop. It consolidates experience into episodic, procedural, and semantic memory without updating its backbone language model, creating a reusable library for traffic‑simulation workflows. Evaluations on two benchmarks with three different LLM backbones show that SimSkill can improve verified completion rates by up to 25 percentage points, with procedural and semantic memory contributing complementarily to performance.

By Qi Liu, Qinzheng Wang, Yiming Bie
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

BehaviorWorldGen: Closing the Loop between Action Models and World Simulators via Controllable Behavior-Aware Structured World Generation

arXiv:2608.22187v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern driving action models are increasingly improved in a self-improvement loop, where a learned world simulator imagines future observations and t...

By Jiaqi Wang, Zhuo Zhang, Haining Guan, Tingguang Zhou, Haowen Cui, Zhongyang Zhu, Yulong Zheng, ChuanYe Wang, Xuefeng Chen, Zhen Yang, Tianchen Deng, Feiyang Tan, Hangning Zhou, Bo Dai, Lixia Shen, Xiwu Chen, Xiyang Wang, Jiajun Zhu
arXiv AI
Sep 12

SimSkill: A Self-Evolving LLM Agent for Skill and Knowledge Accumulation in Traffic Simulation

SimSkill is a self‑evolving large‑language‑model agent designed for the SUMO traffic simulator. It continuously detects capability gaps, creates and solves environment‑grounded tasks, verifies solutions via an action–critic loop, and stores experiences in episodic, procedural, and semantic memory. Evaluations on two held‑out benchmarks across three LLM backbones show up to a 25‑percentage‑point improvement in verified success, with procedural and semantic memory contributing complementarily.

By Qi Liu, Qinzheng Wang, Can Li, Yiming Bie, Wanjng Ma