arXiv Machine Learning
Localizing Global Discrepancies: Marginal Contributions and Contextual Anomaly Detection
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15
Conformal calibration and look-elsewhere effect in anomaly detection for new-physics searches
arXiv:2606. 13780v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learned anomaly detection is reshaping searches for new physics, but it has outrun the statistics used to interpret it.
arXiv AI
Oct 12
Local Diagnostics of Learned Event Representations for Anomaly Detection at the HL-LHC
The paper investigates anomaly detection in high-energy physics by learning low-dimensional representations of collision events. Using supervised and self-supervised neural embeddings on a large simulated dataset, the authors find that supervised objectives generally outperform self-supervised ones and improve signal efficiency compared to traditional kinematic-feature autoencoders. They also propose a local diagnostic pipeline that models the Standard Model latent space with a Gaussian Mixture Model, profiles components via high-level observables, and ranks these observables by their local discriminating power, thereby linking anomaly scores to specific kinematic features.
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 14
Auditing Frame-Level AUC in Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection: Granularity, Resolution, and Scene Bias
arXiv:2608.11985v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Frame-level area under the ROC curve (AUC) is the dominant evaluation metric for weakly supervised video anomaly detection (WSVAD). Its standard fo...
arXiv AI
Sep 4
Witnesses Explain Anomalies
WAND is an unsupervised tabular anomaly detector that scores each point by how far its projection on unit‑sphere directions deviates from a sub‑Gaussian baseline. The directions that flag a point serve as its explanation, providing per‑feature attribution at no extra cost and recoverable via gradients. On 47 ADBench datasets, WAND matches or exceeds 16 baselines in ROC‑AUC while delivering more accurate, faithful explanations than post‑hoc SHAP, LIME, or ECOD, all with linear scoring time and a probe‑efficiency guarantee.
arXiv AI
Oct 1
TED:Text-Axis Evidence Decomposition for Prompted Anomaly Localization
The paper introduces TED (Text-Axis Evidence Decomposition), a post‑hoc scoring method that improves anomaly localization in CLIP‑based detectors without altering the backbone or prompts. TED evaluates whether ambiguous responses are better supported by defect patches or normal patches, thereby distinguishing true defects from visually complex normal regions. Experiments show that TED significantly enhances pixel‑level localization across frozen VLM backbones and adapted hosts, especially under hard‑false‑positive competition.
arXiv AI
Sep 4
Differentiable Interval Bottlenecks for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Numerical Data
DIFFINT is a reconstruction‑based anomaly detector that uses a differentiable autoencoder with a latent bottleneck composed of soft, axis‑aligned interval memberships. Each latent unit represents a human‑readable hyper‑rectangle in feature space, allowing the model to encode how strongly an instance falls inside each interval and to compute reconstruction error as the anomaly score. The method provides a certified lower bound on reconstruction error for points outside all active intervals, a suppression mechanism for sparse abnormalities, and a closed‑form, label‑free importance ranking for each (unit, feature) pair, achieving top performance on 48 ADBench benchmarks against 22 baselines.