LiveAct: Towards Real-Time Multi-Agent World Models with Heterogeneous Action Interfaces
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
World Action Agent (WAA) is a multi‑agent framework that lets vision‑language models (VLMs) directly pilot robots by operating within a visual action workspace. The workspace provides automatically selected contact views, editable action rehearsals, and in‑view correction to refine decisions before low‑level execution. WAA learns procedural skills from expert videos and human teaching, and its interaction traces can train smaller VLMs, achieving state‑of‑the‑art success on LIBERO‑Pro and improving out‑of‑domain performance on robosuite and Qwen3.5‑9B.
arXiv:2607. 11119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robot manipulation is a complex task that requires visual understanding, physical reasoning, planning, and closed-loop control.
arXiv:2607. 04927v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) provide a promising alternative to Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies by using video-based world modeling as dense supervision for robot action learning.
DELE-w0.5 is a robotic manipulation framework that predicts future latent states instead of generating full video sequences, thereby inferring robot actions directly from these compact representations. By focusing on physical state changes rather than visual transitions, it reduces model complexity and inference latency. In 480 real‑robot trials across four long‑horizon tasks, DELE‑w0.5 achieved 62.5 % overall task success and 81.3 % macro ordered‑stage progress, outperforming the strongest baseline by 47.5 and 30.7 percentage points.
The report evaluates the GPT-6-Astra multimodal large language model (MLLM) on the EBench platform, comparing two agent configurations: direct control, where the agent generates waypoint commands, and harness with policy, where it can invoke post‑trained vision‑language‑action (VLA) or world action model (WAM) policies. Direct control performs competitively overall, excelling on short‑horizon tasks and showing stable generalization, but falls behind on long‑horizon, tabletop, and high‑precision contact‑rich tasks. The harness with policy approach combines the strengths of both components, achieving success rates comparable to the best post‑trained policies while reducing token cost, yet still lags behind the standalone upper bounds due to suboptimal policy invocation and execution issues.
arXiv:2609.38059v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world robot learning is constrained by the cost of collecting experience and evaluating candidate behaviors. Video generation models offer a sca...