Profiling a Frontier Agent with EBench: From Direct Control to Harness with Policy
Read the original on arXiv AI →The report evaluates the GPT-6-Astra multimodal large language model (MLLM) on the EBench platform, comparing two agent configurations: direct control, where the agent generates waypoint commands, and harness with policy, where it can invoke post‑trained vision‑language‑action (VLA) or world action model (WAM) policies. Direct control performs competitively overall, excelling on short‑horizon tasks and showing stable generalization, but falls behind on long‑horizon, tabletop, and high‑precision contact‑rich tasks. The harness with policy approach combines the strengths of both components, achieving success rates comparable to the best post‑trained policies while reducing token cost, yet still lags behind the standalone upper bounds due to suboptimal policy invocation and execution issues.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.