arXiv Computation and Language By Akira Ise, Kotaro Kumagai, Yuta Yamaguchi, Hisanori Ozaki, Yukio Uematsu, Ikuya Yamada

Lit3R: Retrieve-Relate-Read for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering over Scientific Literature

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

Lit3R is a system developed by tus-nlp for the LitTraceQA shared task, which focuses on evidence-grounded question answering over scientific literature. The system combines off-the-shelf retrieval, reranking, and large language model components without task-specific training, using an iterative retrieval process that merges BM25-based sparse and dense retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, and LLM verification, along with paper-to-paper expansion. In the official test set, Lit3R achieved a 4th place ranking on the leaderboard.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Oct 15

SciRerankBench: Benchmarking Rerankers Towards Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generation with LLMs

SciRerankBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate rerankers in retrieval‑augmented large language models (RAG‑LLMs) for scientific literature question answering. It covers five scientific subjects and introduces three types of question‑context‑answer pairs—Noisy Contexts, Semantically Similar but Logically Irrelevant Contexts, and Counterfactual Contexts—to test noise resilience, relevance disambiguation, and factual consistency. The study evaluates 13 popular rerankers across five LLM families, offering detailed insights into their strengths and limitations.

By Haotian Chen, Qingqing Long, Meng Xiao, Xiao Luo, Wei Ju, Chengrui Wang, Yuanchun Zhou, Xuezhi Wang, Hengshu Zhu
arXiv AI
Jul 28

VecTree-RAG: An Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Combining Vector and Tree Retrieval for Efficiency and Accuracy

arXiv:2607. 23006v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific question answering requires a retrieval system to solve two distinct problems: identifying which papers are relevant and locating the supporting evidence within those papers.

By Xinyan Zhong, Yuwei Shi, Yuqi Wei, Chen Shen, Tianhang Zhou, Zhenghao Wu
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Re-ranking and Late Interaction Drive Retrieval Quality: A Controlled Comparison of RAG Strategies for Scientific Question Answering

The paper presents a controlled comparison of six retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) strategies for scientific question answering on a large arXiv corpus. All pipelines use the same LLM generator and evaluation protocol, differing only in retrieval design—ranging from classic dense retrieval to late‑interaction methods like ColBERTv2. The authors also release a synthetic question dataset and code to enable reproducible, large‑scale evaluation of RAG trade‑offs.

By Bhagyesh Rathi, Eshan Chawla, William B. Andreopoulos
arXiv AI
Sep 2

EGT-KG: Evidence-Grounded Typed KG Retrieval for Practical Scientific QA with Small Language Models

The paper introduces EGT-KG, an evidence‑grounded typed knowledge graph retrieval framework designed to enhance scientific question answering with small language models (SLMs). It compares three QA settings—standard Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) and two EGT‑KG variants (automatically generated and expert‑defined relation schemas)—using a six‑dimensional evaluation on a biopolymer‑bound soil composite literature benchmark. Results show that both EGT‑KG variants outperform vanilla RAG, with the llama3:8b model achieving a final score of 70.37 (+14.67%) and 68.82 (+12.14%) for the AS and ES variants, respectively.

By Muran Yu, Jiechao Gao, Yuandong Pan, Barney H. Miao, Andrew C. Lesh, Kincho H. Law, Jie Wang, Michael D. Lepech
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

RESEARCHHUB: A Personalized Literature Discovery System for Biomedical Preprints

ResearchHub is an interactive system designed for personalized discovery of biomedical preprints. It uses a bi‑encoder retriever called prism, which leverages GPT‑4o‑generated queries and a hybrid ranking objective, to retrieve relevant papers from a MedRxiv corpus. The system enhances recommendation quality through novelty, diversity, curriculum ordering, and provides frontier retrieval, DPP‑based re‑ranking, and lightweight attribution cards, all operating with low latency.

By Viswonathan Manoranjan, Taeyoon Kim, Nicholas Do, Sang Woo Kim, Dawei Li, Zhen Tan, Tianlong Chen, Yunmei Liu