arXiv AI

Flexible and Interpretable Accent Distance Measurements

The paper introduces a method for measuring accent differences that balances interpretability and practicality. It proposes using articulatory representations obtained via articulatory inversion as an interpretable basis for accent comparison, while employing optimal transport to compare accents across any type of recording. This approach aims to overcome the limitations of traditional phonetic analyses and embedding‑based methods, which are either time‑consuming or non‑interpretable.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

An Empirical Recipe for Universal Phone Recognition

arXiv:2603. 29042v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Phone recognition (PR) is a key enabler of multilingual and low-resource speech processing tasks, yet robust performance remains elusive.

By Shikhar Bharadwaj, Chin-Jou Li, Kwanghee Choi, Eunjung Yeo, William Chen, Shinji Watanabe, David R. Mortensen
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Benchmarking_Fast_Domain_Adaptation_for_Unsupervised_Speech_Units

The paper introduces ABX-Accent, a benchmark built on the AESRC dataset that evaluates how well representation learning models adapt to 10 different English accents with less than 10 hours of unlabeled data per accent. It adapts the Zero Resources Challenge ABX metrics for each accent and demonstrates a baseline using adaptive domain normalization to fine‑tune a Contrastive Predictive Coding model, achieving a 23.6% relative improvement on across‑speaker ABX scores compared to non‑adapted models. The dataset and evaluation metrics will be released publicly after the paper is accepted.

By Robin San Roman, Manel Khentout, Tu Anh Nguyen, Paul Michel, Yossi Adi, Emmanuel Dupoux
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 4

Beyond Decodability: Reconstructing Language Model Representations with an Encoding Probe

The paper introduces an Encoding Probe that reconstructs language model representations using interpretable features, addressing limitations of traditional decoding probes such as incomparable feature contributions and correlation effects. It evaluates this approach on text and speech transformer models, examining features from acoustics, phonetics, syntax, lexicon, and speaker identity. Findings reveal that speaker-related effects vary with training objectives and datasets, while syntactic and lexical features independently contribute to reconstruction, offering a complementary perspective on model interpretation.

By Gaofei Shen, Martijn Bentum, Tomas O. Lentz, Afra Alishahi, Grzegorz Chrupa{\l}a
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Heard but Not Heeded: Paralinguistic Information Encoding and Loss in Audio-Language Models

The paper investigates whether audio‑language models capture paralinguistic cues beyond spoken content. Using the Expresso dataset and four open‑source models, the authors trace how speaking style information is encoded in the late layers of the audio encoder but is degraded before reaching the final output. They find that some models are content‑driven while others are acoustic‑driven, revealing a gap between what is encoded and what is utilized in current audio‑language models.

By Bhuvan Koduru, Dareen Safar B Alharthi, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj
arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

Evaluation of Phonetic Encoding Algorithms on Transcription Datasets

The paper introduces a new evaluation framework for phonetic encoding algorithms, using a generalized Rand Index called the Hüllermeier‑Rifqi Index. It measures discordance by comparing pairwise similarity scores of ground‑truth IPA transcriptions with those of encoded strings, adjusted against a random generator. The method is applied to multilingual datasets, assessing recall via collision rate and demonstrating its use in evaluating orthographic transparency.

By Can \"Ozbey, Emre Kaplan, Berkin Deniz Kahya
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

Benchmarking_Fast_Domain_Adaptation_for_Unsupervised_Speech_Units

The paper introduces ABX-Accent, a benchmark for evaluating how well unsupervised speech representation learning models adapt to new accents. It uses the AESRC dataset with 10 English accents, each providing less than 10 hours of unlabeled data, and adapts the Zero Resources Challenge ABX metrics to these accents. A baseline model employing adaptive domain normalization to fine‑tune a Contrastive Predictive Coding model shows a 23.6% relative improvement on across‑speaker ABX scores compared to non‑adapted models.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

Bulbul: A Dataset for Dialectal Arabic Speech Recognition

arXiv:2608.21950v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Arabic automatic speech recognition (ASR) faces unique challenges due to diglossia, extensive regional dialect variation, and limited speech resource...

By Ahmed Ashraf, Aisha Alansari, Fadel Al Abbas, Nada Almarwani, Samah Aloufi, Saad Ezzini, Maged S. Al-Shaibani, Doaa Dalaq, AbdelRahim A. Elmadany, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed, Mohamed Mehdi Trigui, Dania Refai, Layan Refai, Mohamed Akrout, Mustafa Jarrar, Wasfi G. Al-Khatib, Alaa Dalaq, Darin El-Nakla, Samir Abdaljalil, Abdulrahman Al-Fakih, Nour El Imane Zeghib, Moussa Redah, Salmane Chafik, Mohamed El-Attar, Rima Grati, Sarah Kohail, Malak Alkhorasani, Khadijah Al Safwan, Ismail M. Mudhaffar, Ali Altam, Ahmed Al-Shaikh, Adnan Saeed, Hamzah Luqman