arXiv:2605. 28390v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Test-time skill evolving is regarded as a new paradigm for enhancing deployed agentic systems.
By Xujun Li, Kehan Zheng, Mingyuan Zhao, Yize Geng, Jinfeng Zhou, Qi Zhu, Fei Mi, Lifeng Shang, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang
arXiv:2606. 04455v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current AI benchmarks evaluate agents on task execution within human-designed workflows.
By Xinyu Lu, Tianshu Wang, Pengbo Wang, zujie wen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
SPADE (Self-Play in Adaptive Synthetic Executable Environments) is a reinforcement‑learning framework where a single large language model acts as both an Environment Designer—creating executable, long‑horizon training environments—and a Reasoning Agent—learning to act within those environments. The framework uses a regret signal based on the difference between rewarded performance with and without privileged hints to guide the Designer toward environments that are challenging yet solvable. Experiments show that, when scaled to 30‑billion‑parameter models, SPADE outperforms fixed‑environment baselines by significant margins across math, science, code, and reasoning benchmarks, and improves tool‑use performance on BFCL‑v4 and ACEBench‑Agent.
whyItMatters":"By making environment design a learnable component, SPADE enables continuous self‑improvement and demonstrates that adaptive, self‑generated training environments can substantially boost language‑model performance across diverse tasks."
By Bo Liu, Simon Yu, Yiding Jiang, Ao Qu, Andrew Zhao, Zichen Liu, Junsu Kim, Zijian Zhou, Seungone Kim, Tongzheng Ren, Mickel Liu, Hanfei Yu, Zhaorun Chen, Weiyan Shi, Paul Pu Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Yejin Choi, Natasha Jaques
arXiv:2610.33024v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Harness self-evolution offers a practical route for LLM agents to improve from execution experience without updating model parameters. Its effectiven...
By Zhihao Yang, Haojin Wang, Juncheng Wu, Kuan Zhang, Yukun Chen, Run Luo, Yaojie Lu, Yuyin Zhou, Lu Wang, Xianpei Han
Agent self-evolution in long-horizon LLM systems is largely procedural: useful experience is not merely stored information, but reusable procedures for searching, debugging, and verification. Yet current evaluations do not isolate this form of transfer.
Agentic‑TTT introduces a test‑time policy that decides when and how to apply test‑time training (TTT) to large language models. By treating TTT procedures as tools and learning from the utility gains of its decisions, the policy can trade off performance improvements against computational cost. On a benchmark, Agentic‑TTT nearly doubles the utility of the base model, adapts to unseen domains, and demonstrates autonomous self‑improvement capabilities.
By Jiahao Lu, Mohan Kankanhalli