arXiv Machine Learning By Ruichang Zhang, Mustafa A. Mustafa

Learning Defensive Policies against Diverse Inference Attacks for Smart Meter Privacy

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces a black-box defense strategy for smart meter data that uses a proxy-guided hierarchical reinforcement learning framework to generate battery-based load-shaping policies. These policies inject realistic yet misleading appliance-level signatures into aggregate power signals, disrupting non-intrusive load monitoring attacks. Experiments on UK-DALE and REDD datasets show significant increases in appliance-level reconstruction error and reductions in attacker F1 scores across multiple unseen NILM models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

PEARL: Structural Privacy-Utility Control in Human-Centric CPS via Personalized Early-Exit Deep Reinforcement Learning

PEARL is a framework for human‑centric cyber‑physical systems that uses a dual‑path Early‑Exit Deep Q‑Network to control the trade‑off between privacy and utility. By training per‑branch binary labels—Utility Confidence Labels (UCL) and Privacy Confidence Labels (PCL)—based on mutual information between private states and observable actions, PEARL selects the shallowest exit that satisfies both privacy and utility constraints, avoiding noise injection. The system includes an MI‑based feedback loop to detect behavioral drift and trigger retraining, and experiments on a smart‑home HVAC system and a VR smart classroom show a 25.67% reduction in adversarial state‑inference accuracy with only a 10‑16% utility cost.

By Mojtaba Taherisadr, Salma Elmalaki
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 1

IntraShuffler: A Privacy Preserving Framework for Heterogeneous DP Federated Learning

Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity. In practice, many HDP-FL systems employ $\varepsilon$-aware server aggregation to improve model utility by re-weighting client updates according to their declared privacy budgets.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Theoretically Principled Federated Learning for Balancing Privacy and Utility

The paper introduces a general learning framework that protects privacy in federated learning by distorting model parameters, enabling a trade‑off between privacy and utility. The algorithm supports arbitrary privacy measurements and delivers personalized utility‑privacy balances for each parameter, client, and communication round. The authors prove that the gap between their algorithm’s utility loss and the optimal loss is sub‑linear in iterations, provide a convergence rate, and demonstrate empirically that their method outperforms baselines under the same privacy budget.

By Xiaojin Zhang, Wenjie Li, Yiming Li, Wei Chen, Shutao Xia, Qiang Yang