Hugging Face Trending Papers

Learned Coordination Conventions in Cooperative MARL: Measuring the Translation Gap Between Theory-Informed Roles and Learned Routing

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Role-semantic assignments provide priors over how heterogeneous agents may coordinate, but cooperative MARL systems instead settle on conventions through decentralized, non-stationary learning, with no guarantee that the resulting structure matches those priors. We study this translation gap between theory-informed role expectations and learned coordination structure through a diagnostic combining a role-routing matrix, formation sensitivity ($Δ_{\max}$), and gradient/occlusion attribution across three-role MiniGrid and SMACv2 (Terran) environments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Jun 30

Learned Coordination Conventions in Cooperative MARL: Measuring the Translation Gap Between Theory-Informed Roles and Learned Routing

arXiv:2606. 29541v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Role-semantic assignments provide priors over how heterogeneous agents may coordinate, but cooperative MARL systems instead settle on conventions through decentralized, non-stationary learning, with no guarantee that the resulting structure matches those priors.

By Yoosung Hong
arXiv AI
Aug 11

The Collaboration Gap: Exploration and Benchmarking of Open-World Agentic Cooperation

arXiv:2511. 02687v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The trajectory of AI development suggests that we will increasingly rely on agent-based systems powered by language models, composed of independently developed agents with different information, privileges, and tools.

By Tim R. Davidson, Adam Fourney, Saleema Amershi, Robert West, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar
arXiv AI
Oct 19

Coordination Matters: Process-Aware Evaluation of Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces a process‑aware evaluation framework for cooperative multi‑agent reinforcement learning that supplements traditional outcome metrics with diagnostics of interference, coordinated task completion, participation, and coordination efficiency. Using the STAT testbed and two established benchmarks, the authors demonstrate that policies with similar returns can differ markedly in coordination behavior, and that reward shaping can alter coordination without affecting overall task return. The framework reveals distinct process signatures across spatial, task, and agent scaling and remains informative across different coordination mechanisms.

By Maria Ana Cardei, Matthew Landers, Afsaneh Doryab
arXiv AI
Aug 28

SIGMA: Structured Noise-Effect-Aware Grouped Multi-Agent Aggregation

SIGMA is a hierarchical framework for cooperative multi‑agent reinforcement learning that addresses structured noise effects—local correlations in noise-induced decision impacts among agents with strong task dependencies. It groups agents into adaptive local structures using density‑based clustering, aggregates intra‑group representations to smooth deviations, and then applies inter‑group attention to integrate information while respecting heterogeneous contributions. Experiments on noisy‑observation StarCraft II tasks confirm that SIGMA improves robustness to observation noise without sacrificing performance in clean environments.

By Li Mingqian