arXiv:2609.22818v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Memory-poisoning defenses for LLM agents are typically evaluated by their ability to prevent attacks. However, the traffic they process is rarely adv...
By Pritom Bhowmik
arXiv:2606. 26479v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work (2024 to 2026) has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection: rather than training the model to refuse malicious instructions, enforce security outside the model with a deterministic policy that mediates the agent's actions.
By Praneeth Narisetty, Shiva Nagendra Babu Kore, Uday Kumar Reddy Kattamanchi, Jayaram Kumarapu
arXiv:2607. 18063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents process external content, exposing them to prompt injection and multi-turn manipulation.
By Devina Jain, David Hartmann, Chuan Li
arXiv:2607. 15467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge distillation enables an adversary to replicate a proprietary classifier by querying its prediction interface and training a surrogate on the returned probability vectors.
By Khawaja Abaid Ullah, Mohammad Javad Khojasteh
arXiv:2607. 26574v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safety classifiers ("guards") are the dominant black-box defense for vision-language models, yet a guard judges an input's surface form, not its meaning: a harmful request re-encoded as set theory, formal logic, a classical language, code, or text rendered inside an image slips past a guard that would block it in plain language - the decode gap.
By Haoyu Zhang, Zhuoxi Wang, Shibo Zheng, Yi Feng, Xiao Luo, Zijian Xiao, Haowen Xu, Xiangchen Guan, Mohammad Zandsalimy, Shanu Sushmita
arXiv:2605. 08442v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Persistent memory attacks against LLM agents achieve high attack success rates against open-source models.
By Jun Wen Leong