arXiv Machine Learning By Khawaja Abaid Ullah, Mohammad Javad Khojasteh

ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classification

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 15467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge distillation enables an adversary to replicate a proprietary classifier by querying its prediction interface and training a surrogate on the returned probability vectors.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Reproducible, License-Aware Distillation Recipe for CPUDeployable Safety Classification

arXiv:2608.21570v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying a safety layer for large language models on commodity hardware is constrained by the guards available to do it: current open guard models hol...

By Edson Rodrigues da Cruz Filho, Paulo Ricardo Ferreira Neves, Paulo Henrique Eleuterio Falsetti, Jo\~ao Vitor Pavan, Ian Degaspari, Henrique Vieira Laturrague, Patrick Vieira Laturrague, Guilherme Nielsen Dias, Marccello Wilson Perez Berto, Gustavo Voltani Von Atzingen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Layered LLM Defenses as an Ensemble: Access Tiers, Inference Cost, and the Measured Failure Correlation Between Defense Layers

The paper investigates whether stacking multiple defenses around large language models (LLMs) truly compounds security. Using the Adversary Access‑Tier Model (AATM) and a cost‑tiering system, the authors analyze a seven‑layer defense stack and find that failure correlations between layers are consistently positive, meaning the residual attack success is higher than the multiplicative prediction. Despite high coverage and low false refusals, the stack’s performance is largely driven by common architectural causes rather than diverse, independent defenses.

By Abrar Alotaibi, Muhammad Shahid Jabbar, Sadam Al-Azani, Moataz Ahmed
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

When Clean Data Hurts: Learning with Monotone Corruptions Beyond Binary Classification

The paper investigates learning with monotone adversarial corruptions, extending previous binary classification results to multiclass and partial binary settings. It shows that even a small number of strategically inserted corrupted examples can render a learnable multiclass problem with DS dimension 2 completely unlearnable, and provides matching upper bounds when the adversary’s budget is sublinear. The work also demonstrates that classic error rates remain attainable under bounded or limited‑view adversaries.

By Julian Asilis, Shaddin Dughmi, Chirag Pabbaraju
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Approaching the Harm of Gradient Attacks While Only Flipping Labels

The paper investigates the impact of label‑flipping attacks on distributed machine learning, where an adversary can only flip a limited number of training labels. It formalizes the attack as a per‑round constrained optimization problem, derives a greedy label‑selection rule for logistic regression, and shows that this rule is provably optimal under mean aggregation. Experiments demonstrate that optimized label flipping can significantly degrade model accuracy, outperforming random flips, and that the attack transfers to other robust aggregators such as coordinate‑wise median and trimmed mean.

By Abdessamad El-Kabid, El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi