arXiv AI August 20, 2026 By Godwin Abuh Faruna

Latent Space Refusal Anchoring for Low-Resource African Languages: Mechanistic Safety Recovery Without Retraining

The paper introduces Latent Space Refusal Anchoring (LSR‑Anchoring), a training‑free technique that extracts a refusal direction from English prompts and applies it to the residual stream of instruction‑tuned models at inference time. The primary variant, Mean‑Activation Steering (MAS), works across several architectures (Llama‑3‑8B, Llama‑3.1‑70B, Mistral‑7B‑Instruct, Qwen2.5‑7B), restoring safety for low‑resource African languages with minimal performance loss, while a refined SAE‑Derived Steering (SDS) further reduces KL divergence without degrading legitimate prompt performance. The method shows positive transfer for Yoruba, Igbo, Igala, and Hausa, but fails for Arabic, suggesting a geometric mismatch rather than a data scarcity issue.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Low-Resource Safety Failures Are Action Failures, Not Representation Failures

arXiv:2606. 01196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety alignment learned in high-resource languages transfers poorly to low-resource languages.

By Rashad Aziz, Ikhlasul Akmal Hanif, Fajri Koto

llms benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 8

Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Models

arXiv:2602. 06941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models can recover mid-generation from task-misaligned activation steering, producing explicit verbal restarts (e.

By Alex McKenzie, Keenan Pepper, Stijn Servaes, Martin Leitgab, Murat Cubuktepe, Mike Vaiana, Diogo de Lucena, Judd Rosenblatt, Michael S. A. Graziano

llms robotics fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

Jul 29

Minimizing Targeted Activations: Input-Only Suppression of Evaluation-Awareness Latents in Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 25907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering controls model behavior by editing internal activations at inference time.

By Deepanshu Mody, Samarth Agarwal, Utkarsh Mittal, Dipesh Mahato

llms safety

arXiv AI

Jul 17

Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect

arXiv:2607. 14111v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Can small language models detect and report on perturbations their own internal activations?

By Ely Hahami, Ishaan Sinha, Lavik Jain

llms fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 3

From Script to Semantics: Prompting Strategies for African NLI

arXiv:2606. 03304v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated in multilingual settings, yet their inference behavior in low-resource African languages remains underexplored especially under pure prompting without fine-tuning.

By Anuj Tiwari, Terry Oko-odion, Hannah Nwokocha

llms fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 13

GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs

arXiv:2507. 18043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time steering methods offer a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying internal activations at test time without updating model weights.

By Duy Nguyen, Archiki Prasad, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal

llms fine-tuning multimodal safety

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

Low-Resource Safety Failures Are Action Failures, Not Representation Failures

Endogenous Resistance to Activation Steering in Language Models

Minimizing Targeted Activations: Input-Only Suppression of Evaluation-Awareness Latents in Large Language Models

Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect

From Script to Semantics: Prompting Strategies for African NLI

GrAInS: Gradient-based Attribution for Inference-Time Steering of LLMs and VLMs