← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Tohid Ghasemnejad, Ahmadreza Argha, Mark Grosser, John Wang, Min Yang, Thantrira Porntaveetus, Tony Roscioli, Nigel H. Lovell, Mahmoud Aarabi, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny

Large Language Model Agents for Evidence Based Genetic Disease Severity Classification

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper presents an autonomous AI agent that combines ReAct and Retrieval-Augmented Generation to classify the severity of genetic diseases using 10,211 Human Phenotype Ontology terms. It applies ACMG severity guidelines and ACOG quality-of-life criteria, retrieving PubMed literature to produce interpretable reasoning chains and verify claims. The agent achieved 93.55% accuracy on phenotype-level classification and identified 3,283 autosomal recessive gene pairs with severe presentations, with 95.2% concordance in external validation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Sep 7

A Semantic Model of Genetic Evidence: A Step Toward Bridging the Basic-Science-Clinic Gap

The article presents a new semantic model for representing scientific evidence, specifically tailored to genetics, that extends existing standards by adding fine‑grained, domain‑specific structure. It aligns with FHIR Evidence and SEPIO, incorporates a compact vocabulary validated by SHACL, and was tested in a human‑AI annotation pilot on six genetics papers, producing 28 evidence items and 95 source‑anchored assertions. The authors argue that this model advances trustworthy, AI‑ready infrastructure for variant interpretation by providing a reference data model and validation schema for genetic evidence.

By Michael Bouzinier, Dmitry Etin
benchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Advancing Clinical Genomic Analysis with a Skill-Centred Agent

The paper introduces ClinGeX, a large‑language‑model agent that uses 105 curated executable skills to automate clinical genomic analysis. In benchmark tests, ClinGeX achieved 71.7% macro‑averaged task‑level concordance, outperforming the best comparator at 45.7%. Human‑AI collaboration studies showed ClinGeX significantly improved case‑level concordance across variant analysis, rare disease interpretation, and oncology decision‑making, while also reducing interpretation time.

By Qiaoyu Zheng, Weike Zhao, Yanjie Fan, Ye Cao, Mengqi Jiang, Xiao Zhou, Xiaoman Zhang, Pengcheng Qiu, Yongguo Yu, Yanfeng Wang, Ya Zhang, Chaoyi Wu, Weidi Xie
agentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Teaching agentic AI to generalize expert diagnostic reasoning in rare diseases

arXiv:2606.16149v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Rare disease diagnosis depends on expert reasoning that is scarce and difficult to transfer. Large language models rank the correct disease first i...

By Minh-Ha Nguyen, Erica Gray, Bryce A. Schuler, Kevin W. Byram, Chih-Ting Yang, Fan Ma, Hua Xu, Wu-Chen Su, Chao Yan, Wei-Qi Wei, Adam Wright, Lisa Bastarache, Josh F. Peterson, Lingyao Li, Siyuan Ma, Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Rizwan Hamid, Thomas A. Cassini, Cathy Shyr
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Aug 18

DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models

arXiv:2505. 14107v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The emergence of groundbreaking large language models capable of performing complex reasoning tasks holds significant promise for addressing various scientific challenges, including those arising in complex clinical scenarios.

By Yakun Zhu, Zhongzhen Huang, Linjie Mu, Yutong Huang, Wei Nie, Jiaji Liu, Shaoting Zhang, Pengfei Liu, Xiaofan Zhang
llmsbenchmarks
More like this →