arXiv:2605. 28066v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in text embedding, yet current adaptation methods like LoRA face significant bottlenecks in computational efficiency and cross-architecture transferability.
By Yu-Che Tsai, Kuan-Yu Chen, Yuan-Hao Chen, Yu-Han Chang, Ching-Yu Tsai, Yu-Hsiang Chuang, Shou-De Lin
arXiv:2511. 20892v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce incorrect or outdated content after being employed.
By Xuyuan Liu, Shengyu Chen, Xinshuai Dong, Yanchi Liu, Xujiang Zhao, Haoyu Wang, Yujun Yan, Haifeng Chen, Zhengzhang Chen
arXiv:2606. 12882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents for long-horizon tasks, yet their performance is shaped not only by model capability and environment design, but also by the harness that mediates agent--environment interaction.
By Xiaoxuan Wang, Haixin Wang, Alexander Taylor, Jason Cong, Yizhou Sun, Wei Wang
arXiv:2511. 20639v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) extend large language models (LLMs) from independent single-model reasoning to coordinative system-level intelligence.
By Jiaru Zou, Ruizhong Qiu, Gaotang Li, Xiyuan Yang, Katherine Tieu, Pan Lu, Ke Shen, Hanghang Tong, Yejin Choi, Jingrui He, James Zou, Mengdi Wang, Ling Yang
The paper introduces a feedforward graph architecture that uses several frozen large language models as computational nodes connected through a shared continuous latent space via learned linear projections. By jointly optimizing projection matrices through backpropagation, the system combines the representations of three small frozen models with two larger ones, culminating in a lightweight cross‑attention output node. With only 17.6 M trainable parameters, the architecture attains state‑of‑the‑art results on ARC‑Challenge, OpenBookQA, and MMLU, surpassing both individual constituent models and parameter‑matched learned classifiers.
By Marcus Armstrong, Navid Ayoobi, Arjun Mukherjee
arXiv:2607. 00510v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowing which training examples drive outputs is fundamental to auditing, correcting, and understanding language models, yet for modern LLMs this remains expensive, approximate, and largely post-hoc.
By Dan Ley, Giang Nguyen, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Julius Adebayo