arXiv:2606. 18075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, yet existing graph-based methods face a fundamental limitation: entity-centric and chunk-centric approaches operate on representations anchored to original text without true knowledge fusion.
By Haoyang Zhong, Yifei Sun, Antong Zhang, Chunping Wang, Lei Chen, Yang Yang
arXiv:2603.28773v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet factually incorrect content when used for language generation (a phenomenon of...
By Dobrik Georgiev, Kheeran K. Naidu, Alberto Cattaneo, Federico Monti, Carlo Luschi, Daniel Justus
arXiv:2608. 09779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Answering complex conditional questions using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) remains a challenge, particularly in domain-specific contexts where general-purpose LLMs and RAG tend to underperform.
By Ghanshyam Verma, Simanta Sarkar, Devishree Pillai, Hotaka Shiokawa, Yourong Xu, Fiona Veazey, Peter Hubbert, Hui Su, Paul Buitelaar
arXiv:2506.05626v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Real-world knowledge can take various forms, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. Among these, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are...
By Xiaohua Lu, Liubov Tupikina, Mehwish Alam
arXiv:2511. 07457v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in modeling sequential textual data and generalizing across diverse tasks.
By Jiarui Feng, Donghong Cai, Yixin Chen, Muhan Zhang
The paper investigates a parametric approach to knowledge graph memory by compiling each entity into a LoRA adapter, enabling zero‑cost query-time retrieval via weight injection. On the MetaQA dataset, these adapters encode context‑free factual knowledge, improving exact‑match scores by up to +0.243 over a base model and achieving an oracle gap of +0.283. However, the stored knowledge is not recoverable through similarity or embedding‑based methods, indicating that knowledge is stored locally and does not transfer across semantically neighboring entities.
By Martino M. L. Pulici, Cuong Xuan Chu, Evgeny Kharlamov, Volker Tresp