arXiv AI

A Unified Framework for Context-Aware and Relation-Aware Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv:2606. 18075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, yet existing graph-based methods face a fundamental limitation: entity-centric and chunk-centric approaches operate on representations anchored to original text without true knowledge fusion.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

UnWeaving the knots of GraphRAG -- turns out VectorRAG is almost enough

arXiv:2603. 29875v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: One of the key problems in Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems is that chunk-based retrieval pipelines represent the source chunks as atomic objects, mixing the information contained within such a chunk into a single vector.

By Ryszard Tuora, Mateusz Gali\'nski, Micha{\l} Godziszewski, Micha{\l} Karpowicz, Mateusz Czy\.znikiewicz, Adam Kozakiewicz, Tomasz Zi\k{e}tkiewicz
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

SelfGraphRAG: Bridging the Supervision Gap in Graph-Based RAG with Synthetic QA Generation

SelfGraphRAG is a framework that generates synthetic question‑answer pairs directly from the structure of a knowledge graph to train a query‑conditioned graph retriever. By capturing multi‑hop paths and local neighborhoods, the generated questions provide relational supervision without requiring manually labeled data. Experiments on multi‑hop question answering and classification tasks show that SelfGraphRAG improves retrieval precision and downstream reasoning performance compared to embedding‑based baselines.

By Ben Lagnese, Manas Gaur
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Automated Tree Knowledge Graph Construction using Ontology Expansion and Retrieval from Vietnamese History Textbooks

The paper presents an end‑to‑end pipeline for automatically constructing a tree‑structured knowledge graph (KG) from Vietnamese high school history textbooks and evaluating retrieval strategies that exploit the KG’s hierarchical structure. The KG construction uses a three‑phase hybrid relation extraction process, including intra‑batch deduplication, approximate cross‑batch search, and LLM extraction with a centroid filter and dual‑LLM validator, resulting in 750 nodes and 4,341 semantic edges across 41 ontology types. Retrieval evaluation compares three graph traversal strategies—Top‑Down, Horizontal, and Bottom‑Up—on a benchmark of 1,210 Vietnamese queries, finding that the Top‑Down strategy with structural information outperforms a vector baseline by 4.7 percentage points in NDCG@10.

By Ket Doan Nguyen, Minh N. H. Nguyen