arXiv AI By Jayant Parashar, Suchendra M. Bhandarkar

KACE: Knowledge-Adaptive Context Engineering for Mathematical Reasoning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 00532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context engineering can improve large language models without updating their weights, but mathematical reasoning exposes a key limitation: feedback accumulated in one growing prompt causes context bloat and limits the amount of learned guidance that can be used.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

CLPO: Curriculum Learning meets Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning

arXiv:2509. 25004v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Online reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models, but most methods still optimize reasoning trajectories over the static problem set, wasting rollout budget on solved or overly difficult problems.

By Shijie Zhang, Zheng Xiao, Shiyu Liu, Guohao Sun, Kevin Zhang, Xiang Guo, Rujun Guo, Shaoyu Liu, Wangxiao Zhao, Guanjun Jiang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces

Ladders-of-Thought (LoT) is a framework that enhances reasoning in small- to mid-scale large language models by automatically generating easier variants of reasoning problems and organizing them into difficulty buckets. It uses a self‑evolving bandit scheduler to adaptively allocate training, improving performance across math and multi‑hop reasoning tasks on 1–8 B models. LoT achieves significant gains (e.g., +32 pp on AddSub, +16 pp on QASC) and converges faster than staged curricula.

By Minghui Liu, Thomas Magelinski, Dehao Yuan, Qi Yu, Furong Huang
arXiv AI
Sep 7

A Verifier-Guided Explainable Reasoning Framework with Gold-Anchored QLoRA, Task-Aware Mixture-of-Experts, and Group-Relative RLVR

The paper introduces a verifier‑guided explainable reasoning framework for educational question answering that integrates gold‑anchored QLoRA, a task‑aware symbolic router, and group‑relative RLVR. It adapts Qwen2.5‑3B‑Instruct with field‑weighted QLoRA supervision, routes logic problems to a FOL/Z3 verifier and physics problems to a symbolic solver, and uses verifier feedback for candidate evaluation, self‑revision, and reward construction. Experiments on 438 held‑out examples show that RLVR boosts reasoning depth (P3) from 50.68 % to 72.20 %, while symbolic verification improves answer reliability at the system level.

By Thi Kim Trang Vo, Nam Tien Le, Thi Kim Nguyet Vo, Minh Khang Tran, Duy Phuong Tran