arXiv AI By Huangfei Jiang, Anning Hu, Kai Sheng, Yuchen Cai, Rui Ge, Xiangyu Kong, Jianghao Lin, Shuzi Chen, Jiyi Weng, Junchi Yan

Investor's Last Exam: Can AI Agents Do Equity Investment Without Seeing the Future?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Investor's Last Exam (ILE) is a new equity‑research benchmark created by experienced buy‑side investors and fund managers. It comprises a versioned financial database of 3.43 million document versions, a task taxonomy aligned with professional analyst deliverables, and an expert‑led framework that links scoring criteria to sources, calculations, and assumptions via financial dependency graphs. The benchmark evaluates 86 assignments, jointly measuring research quality, forecast accuracy, and simulated investment performance, and finds that even top models like GPT‑6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 struggle to translate research capability into predictive performance.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

FinSkillBench: Evaluating AI Agents and Domain Skills for Investment Management

FinSkillBench is an evaluation suite that tests whether language model agents can use financial domain skills to solve investment management tasks across portfolio construction, risk management, and fundamental analysis. The benchmark contains 12 subtasks with 2,603 episodes, each providing point‑in‑time inputs, hidden ground truth, and a verifier. Experiments show that curated skill packages improve performance significantly, while self‑generated skills offer little benefit, indicating that reliable procedural skills are crucial for effective AI agents in this domain.

By Jermyn Zhen Yong Bek, Zhuang Qiang Bok, Zhongtian Sun
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

FrontierFinance: A Challenging Benchmark for Measuring Frontier Intelligence of Finance Agents

AI agents are increasingly deployed for professional investment research, yet no benchmark captures the complexity of the full investor workflow. Existing benchmarks mainly target financial data extraction, a narrow slice that current models have largely saturated, while reference-based metrics and generic LLM-as-a-judge scoring fall short on the open-ended, long-form answers that real analyst queries demand.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

Hedge-Bench: Can Agents Reason Their Way to Better Predictions?

Hedge-Bench is a benchmark comprising 92 real-world environments derived from hedge fund analysts' reasoning traces, designed to test AI agents’ ability to forecast future events from incomplete information. Agents are evaluated on joint success—correct forecasts with over 60% research coverage—across 11 frontier models, achieving rates between 2.54% and 31.52%. Training Muse‑Glimmer with GRPO on 165 environments improves coverage on held‑out tasks and demonstrates generalization to out‑of‑distribution evaluations.

By Mahesh Ramesh, Eric Cho, Alice Lu, Shawn Huang, Baiqing Lyu
arXiv AI
Oct 27

FinAutoRubric: Expert-Guided Automatic Rubric Generation for Evaluating Financial Research Agents

FinAutoRubric is a system that lets experts define reusable evaluation guidance for financial research agents, which the agents then use to automatically generate, review, and validate task‑specific rubrics. The approach replaces costly fixed rubrics with query‑specific ones that incorporate expert standards and can be updated as new information becomes available. On three expert‑authored finance benchmarks, the automatically generated rubrics closely match human scoring and are preferred by in‑house analysts in blind reviews.

By Hoyoung Lee, Suyeol Yun, Jack Haverty, Yunju Cho, Meesong Kim, Daekyung Park, Sumin Kim, Jihoon Kwon, Jasmine Jia Geng, Andrew Chin, Yin Luo, Edward Tong, Yu Yu, Zach Golkhou, Minkyu Kim, Igor Halperin, Young Cha, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Chanyeol Choi, Yongjae Lee