arXiv:2603. 21607v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) significantly improves the factual reliability of LLMs, it does not eliminate hallucinations, so robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) remains essential.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 01033v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a language model hallucinates, the final answer is wrong, but the mistake is not necessarily invisible inside the model.
arXiv:2607. 16643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing hallucination detection methods are typically conducted at the inference stage, without making any modifications to the model itself.
arXiv:2608. 10430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as AI agents frequently exhibit user specification-grounding failures, executing hallucinated, undesired actions to force a resolution rather than expressing uncertainty.
arXiv:2603. 24929v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Understanding and quantifying uncertainty in large language model (LLM) outputs is critical for reliable deployment.
arXiv:2608. 03817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large vision--language models (LVLMs) demonstrate strong multimodal reasoning capabilities but remain prone to hallucination, where model predictions are not grounded in visual evidence.
arXiv:2606. 07528v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination in large language models (LLMs), defined as the generation of factually incorrect or unsupported content, remains a critical barrier to reliable deployment.