arXiv Machine Learning By Aya Elgebaly, Joris Fournel, Benjamin Laine J{\o}nch Jurgensen, Kamil Mikolaj, Anders Christensen, Martin Tolsgaard, Claes Ladefoged, Aasa Feragen

Intersectional Disentangling of Temporal and Acquisition Bias in Fetal Ultrasound

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 02942v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Fairness studies of medical imaging AI often explain subgroup performance gaps through under-representation in the training data.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

Open ultrasound foundation model for robust segmentation and clinical measurement across heterogeneous settings

The paper introduces SonoCorpus, an open dataset of 456,963 ultrasound images with 1,626,085 expert masks from 53 public sources across 24 clinical applications and 17 countries, and SonoBase, an interactive segmentation foundation model pretrained on this data. SonoBase outperforms existing models (SAM2, MedSAM2, MedSAM3) on fifteen diverse evaluation datasets, matching specialist models and achieving clinically relevant accuracy for metrics such as ejection fraction, fetal head circumference, and gestational age. The authors provide full reproducibility resources, including checkpoints, optimizer states, and starter code, to enable community adoption and further development.

By Chao Qin, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan, Sarim Ather, Siddiq Anwar, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Shadab Khan
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

FRAME: separating sampling variation from representational cause in medical imaging fairness

The paper introduces FRAME, a two‑step framework for auditing fairness claims in medical imaging. First, it derives a fair‑model reference distribution that captures the portion of subgroup performance differences attributable to sampling variation. Second, it tests the remaining difference using operators in representation space to assess whether demographic information or disease entanglement drives the bias. Across a large dataset of 702,206 images and 36 encoders, the reference explains a substantial median share of race and age differences, while interventions such as injecting demographic decodability or entangling disease direction have limited impact on the residual bias.

By Mahshad Lotfinia, Daniel Truhn, Andreas Maier, Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh
arXiv AI
Jul 17

Demographically-Conditioned Synthetic Medical Images for Bias Mitigation and Bias Detection in Disease Classifiers

arXiv:2607. 14984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Per-subgroup fairness audits of medical image classifiers face a sample-size problem: minority subgroups in held-out test sets have so few samples that the resulting confidence intervals on per-subgroup performance are wider than the bias the audit is meant to detect.

By Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontier
arXiv AI
Jul 9

CompDiff: Hierarchical Compositional Diffusion for Fair and Zero-Shot Intersectional Medical Image Generation

arXiv:2603. 16551v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models are increasingly used to augment medical imaging datasets for fairer AI, yet a key assumption often goes unexamined: that generators produce equally high-quality images across demographic groups.

By Mahmoud Ibrahim, Bart Elen, Chang Sun, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontier