arXiv:2608. 12358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Product and engineering teams building role-bearing AI agents face an evaluation gap: an agent can produce accurate, safe, and fluent content while still failing the behavioral requirements of its assigned role.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 04148v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI is increasingly used to coordinate planning, implementation, review, and testing in software development, yet it often offers limited transparency into its decisions and interactions.
arXiv:2607. 08285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current AI evaluation frameworks focus primarily on technical performance, including accuracy, robustness, reasoning ability, and policy compliance.
arXiv:2607. 21495v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly created inside organizations by non-engineering users through low-code, no-code, and conversational development environments.
arXiv:2607. 14275v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context engineering has become central to building reliable AI agents, yet it remains largely unmeasured.
arXiv:2608. 15591v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents deployed in production environments face a fundamental tension: the agent's behavior is frozen at deployment time, while the business rules and edge cases it must handle continue to evolve.
arXiv:2512. 04123v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based agents already operate in production across many industries, yet we lack an understanding of what technical methods make deployments successful.