arXiv AI By Jinli Hu, Ross M. Clarke, Yichuan Zhang, Jos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato

Infinite-Parameter LLMs: Generating and Adapting Weights from Live Data

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes an Infinite-Parameter LLM architecture that generates and adapts its weights from live interaction data using a compact hypernetwork and Bayesian updating, allowing the model to learn from real-time user input rather than relying solely on static pretraining. This approach keeps the stored footprint fixed while effectively enabling an infinite set of weights, potentially improving compute efficiency, freeing context windows, and providing persistent, generalizable knowledge across turns. The authors also outline an evaluation protocol to compare this method against traditional in-context learning and retrieval techniques.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

When RL Meets Adaptive Speculative Training: A Unified Training-Serving System

arXiv:2602. 06932v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Speculative decoding can significantly accelerate LLM serving, yet most deployments today disentangle speculator training from serving, treating speculator training as a standalone offline modeling problem.

By Junxiong Wang, Fengxiang Bie, Jisen Li, Zhongzhu Zhou, Zelei Shao, Yubo Wang, Yinghui Liu, Qingyang Wu, Avner May, Sri Yanamandra, Ce Zhang, Tri Dao, Percy Liang, Ben Athiwaratkun, Shuaiwen Leon Song, Chenfeng Xu, Xiaoxia Wu
arXiv AI
Sep 2

APEX-EM: Non-Parametric Online Learning for Autonomous Agents via Structured Procedural-Episodic Experience Replay

APEX-EM is a non‑parametric experience memory that stores full procedural‑episodic traces in a typed Procedural Knowledge Graph and retrieves them via semantic search, structural‑signature matching, and graph traversal. It uses a Plan‑Retrieve‑Generate‑Iterate‑Ingest workflow to produce, quality‑gate, and commit experiences, indexing both successes and failures so the agent learns what to reuse and what to avoid. Evaluations on five benchmarks with a shared GPT‑4o backbone show significant performance gains, such as +7.6 pp on BigCodeBench transfer and +1.4 pp on Lifelong Agent Bench, demonstrating that the memory adds to model capability rather than replacing it.

By Pratyay Banerjee, Masud Moshtaghi, Ankit Chadha