arXiv AI
Incremental Consistency Execution for Autonomous Intelligent Systems
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Verified Tool Calls Improve LLM Agent Reliability Under Non-Atomic Failures
arXiv:2608. 02645v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents rely on external tools to perform multistage tasks.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 10
Tool-Making and Self-Evolving LLM Agents in Low-Latency Systems
arXiv:2607. 08010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
AIVV: Neuro-Symbolic LLM Agent-Integrated Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
arXiv:2604. 02478v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning models excel at detecting anomaly patterns in normal data.
arXiv AI
Oct 7
AegisFlow: A Multi-Agent Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Remediation and Self-Healing in Fragile Data Ecosystems
AegisFlow is a multi‑agent AI framework that automates the detection and remediation of failures in data pipelines, using a Watchdog agent for telemetry and a Repair agent that generates, tests, and deploys code patches via large language models. It employs a non‑intrusive Parallel Shadow Patching approach based on the MAPE‑K loop to validate patches in digital twin environments. Experiments across five failure scenarios show a 98.1% reduction in mean time to repair—from 170 minutes to 3.2 minutes—and a 92% patch success rate, freeing up 98% of data engineering on‑call time for innovation.
arXiv AI
Oct 16
Don't Regenerate, Debug: A Domain-Specific Agent for Repairing Near-Miss Accelerator Kernels
The paper introduces a domain‑specific debugging agent for repairing near‑miss accelerator kernels, arguing that debugging is more efficient than regenerating kernels from scratch. It tackles knowledge scarcity, integrity, and cost control through pattern retrieval, anti‑cheat detection, and convergence safeguards. Empirical results show the debug agent achieves a 66.7% Pass@1 rate and uses 92.8% fewer tokens per success compared to traditional regeneration methods.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9
Tool-Making and Self-Evolving LLM Agents in Low-Latency Systems
Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request. We replace this inference-time coding loop with an agentic tool-making pipeline that compiles repeated SOP steps into validated, versioned tools before deployment.