arXiv:2607. 08010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request. We replace this inference-time coding loop with an agentic tool-making pipeline that compiles repeated SOP steps into validated, versioned tools before deployment.
arXiv:2606. 17546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving LLM-based agents improve mainly by changing their agent harness: the structured execution layer around a base model, including prompts, memory, tools, middleware, runtime state, and the model-tool interaction loop.
arXiv:2603. 18897v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-powered agents execute tasks through a sequential loop of model generation and tool execution.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in agentic coding settings, where they can inspect files, execute commands, run tests, observe failures, and iteratively revise code. This shift raises a central evaluation question: can an agentic LLM generate an end-to-end software artifact that is both deployable and behaviorally correct under execution?
arXiv:2607. 07052v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents deployed for IT operations are typically permanent cost centers because every execution requires full LLM inference, even for previously solved problems.
arXiv:2607. 11042v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in agentic coding settings, where they can inspect files, execute commands, run tests, observe failures, and iteratively revise code.