arXiv:2604. 02951v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human data annotation, especially when involving experts, is often treated as an objective reference.
By Maciej Markiewicz, Beata Bajcar, Wiktoria Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Aleksander Szcz\k{e}sny, Tomasz Adamczyk, Grzegorz Chodak, Karolina Ostrowska, Aleksandra Sawczuk, Jolanta Babiak, Jagoda Szklarczyk, Przemys{\l}aw Kazienko
The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can generate synthetic cyberbullying conversations that replicate the social dynamics of real interactions. Using a comprehensive framework, the authors compare authentic dialogues with synthetic ones from GPT, Grok, and LLaMA across structural, linguistic, affective, and temporal dimensions, and conduct human evaluations of realism. Results show that while LLMs preserve high‑level interaction patterns, they systematically distort finer‑grained social phenomena, with model‑specific biases such as GPT’s suppression of harmful content and Grok’s amplification of aggression.
By Arefeh Kazemi, Hamza Qadeer, Sinan Asci, Joachim Wagner, Brian Davis
arXiv:2601. 05751v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for everyday communication tasks, including drafting interpersonal messages intended to influence and persuade.
By Amalie Brogaard Pauli, Maria Barrett, Max M\"uller-Eberstein, Isabelle Augenstein, Ira Assent
The paper introduces a Situation–Internal state–Behavior Persona method to improve large language models’ ability to impersonate real individuals in social media contexts. It also proposes an evaluation protocol that supplies LLM evaluators with reference information about the target individual. Experiments on a new dataset of social media replies show the method surpasses state‑of‑the‑art in‑context learning baselines, and the protocol correlates moderately with human judgments, while additional tests on fictional characters confirm broader applicability.
By Ji-Lun Peng, Yi-Zhen Zhang, Chun-Nan Chou, Yun-Nung Chen
arXiv:2505.21710v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI model for natural language processing, in identifying targeting and inappropriate...
By Baran Barbarestani, Isa Maks, Piek Vossen
The paper introduces the Persuasion Index (PI), a taxonomy of 15 persuasion dimensions grounded in psychological and communication theories, implemented with 55 lexicon- and rule-based sub-features. PI is modular, allowing individual detectors to be swapped while preserving its theoretical framework. Evaluations on four English argumentative datasets show that PI provides a shared, lightweight feature space that captures meaningful predictive signals and reveals consistent dimension-level associations with persuasion outcomes, with variations across topics and stances.
By Liancheng Gong, Zhiyang Wang, Yiwei Xu, Julia Mendelsohn