arXiv Computer Vision
Image Tokenizers Should Be Trained Between Images
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago
Purify Before You Align: Improving Representation Alignment for Diffusion Models
The paper proposes Local Appearance Purification (LAP), a method that refines the alignment target for diffusion models by removing locally predictable content and focusing on the residual. LAP improves generation quality across multiple pretrained encoders, notably reducing FID from 53.1 to 42.3 on ImageNet-256 with MAE. The authors provide a theoretical framework linking alignment effectiveness to the information emphasized by the target and introduce a constant‑readout test to predict purification benefits.
arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago
Are We Overthinking One-Step Generation?
The paper introduces Priming Models, a two‑stage framework for training one‑step generative models. First, the model is trained on a reconstruction objective such as pixel‑space denoising at a fixed noise level, then it undergoes feature‑space distributional post‑training. This simple reconstruction stage alone is shown to eliminate the difficulty of distributional training, leading to significant improvements in training compute versus generation quality across tasks like class‑conditional image generation, text‑to‑image generation, and world modeling, with a state‑of‑the‑art FID of 1.19 on ImageNet 256×256 using about one‑tenth the compute of previous methods.
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30
LDM-is-AE: Latent Diffusion Model is an Auto-Encoder for End-to-End Image Generation
arXiv:2609.37080v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) typically adopt a two-stage pipeline: an auto-encoder (AE) is first pre-trained to define a latent space, then a diffusi...
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9
BudgetPix: Compute-Adaptive Tokenization for Pixel-Space Image Diffusion
BudgetPix introduces a compute‑adaptive tokenization framework for pixel‑space image diffusion, dynamically allocating computational resources based on visual complexity and spatial layout. It comprises an adaptive encoder using an entropy‑guided quadtree and multi‑scale patch embedder, a scale‑aware decoder, and a flexible training schedule that allows pixel‑space denoisers to operate across variable token counts. The method integrates with existing diffusion architectures, achieving comparable fidelity to larger models while using only a fraction of the compute budget, and demonstrates improved quality‑efficiency tradeoffs in both text‑to‑image and class‑conditional generation.
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1
DC-SAE: Deep Compression Semantic Autoencoder for Faster Diffusion Convergence
arXiv:2609.39222v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-compression tokenizers are essential for scaling latent image generative models. However, aggressive compression creates a fundamental tradeoff be...
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22
What Makes a Good Medical Image Tokenizer? Rethinking Reconstruction and Generation in Medical Image Tokenization
arXiv:2609.24691v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent diffusion models now dominate medical image generation, and every such pipeline rests on a \emph{tokenizer} that compresses images into the late...