arXiv AI
Illuminating the Three Dogmas of Reinforcement Learning under Evolutionary Light
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13
Evolutionary Discovery of Developmental Reward Schedules in Deep Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2606. 20858v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The temporal structure of reward composition in reinforcement learning (RL) is typically hand-designed and held fixed throughout training, leaving the progression of motivational priorities largely unexplored.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3
Quo Vadis, World Modeling?
Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize. World modeling offers a natural intermediate proxy that allows agents to query lower-cost, more controllable feedback before committing to real actions.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence: a coherent framework for multi-agent learning
arXiv:2511. 22226v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The standard theory of model-free reinforcement learning assumes that the environment dynamics are stationary and that agents are decoupled from their environment, such that policies are treated as being separate from the world they inhabit.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Quo Vadis, World Modeling?
arXiv:2608. 02713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continually improving agents require dynamic interaction feedback beyond static supervision, yet direct real-environment interaction is costly, slow, unsafe, and hard to parallelize.
arXiv AI
4d ago
Environment Evolution for Terminal Agents
The paper introduces "environment evolution," a method that incrementally raises the difficulty of interactive environments off‑policy, scheduling their generation across training generations to supply continuous learning signals. It derives three evolution directions tied to a multi‑turn learning objective and implements them via a loop‑engineered multi‑agent harness. Experiments with models such as Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, GPT‑5.6 Sol, Qwen3.6‑27B, and Qwen3.6‑35B‑A3B demonstrate that this approach consistently creates harder environments and boosts terminal‑agent performance on Terminal‑Bench 2.1 by 14.4–18.0 percentage points.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
5d ago
Environment Evolution for Terminal Agents
The paper introduces "environment evolution," a method that incrementally raises the difficulty of interactive environments for terminal agents using off‑policy updates. It derives three evolution directions tied to a multi‑turn learning objective and implements them via a loop‑engineered multi‑agent harness. Experiments with models such as Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, GPT‑5.6 Sol, Qwen3.6‑27B, and Qwen3.6‑35B‑A3B demonstrate that this approach consistently generates harder environments and yields significant performance gains on Terminal‑Bench 2.1.