ICON Decomposition: Auditing Deep Neural Networks with Multivariate Variance-based Concept-level Explanations
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
ICON Decomposition is a new method for explaining deep neural networks by quantifying how much variance each concept explains in a network layer after accounting for all other concepts and the outcome. Unlike previous concept‑based methods that evaluate concepts in isolation, ICON can distinguish genuine model reliance from spurious correlations. Experiments on synthetic data, skin‑lesion, and brain‑imaging models show that ICON recovers concept importance more accurately, isolates truly relied‑upon concepts, and provides sparse explanations validated through retraining and out‑of‑distribution testing.
The paper introduces ICON decomposition, a method for auditing neural networks by decomposing the variance of intermediate representations into contributions from Independent Canonical Concepts (ICON). Unlike traditional decodability metrics, ICON isolates each concept’s influence while conditioning on all other concepts and the outcome, providing a clearer view of which concepts truly drive predictions. Experiments on simulated data and real-world skin‑cancer and neuroimaging tasks show ICON outperforms seven baseline methods and successfully distinguishes genuine shortcuts from merely correlated features.
The paper introduces ICON Decomposition, a method for auditing deep neural networks by decomposing layer-wise representations into independent concept contributions. Unlike existing techniques that rely on linear probes or concept activation vectors, ICON quantifies the variance share each concept explains while conditioning on all other concepts and the outcome, allowing comparison across layers and concept types. Experiments on simulated data, skin‑cancer, and neuroimaging models show that ICON more accurately recovers true concept importance and can distinguish learned shortcuts from correlated concepts, as validated by retraining and out‑of‑distribution tests.
arXiv:2607. 29614v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of deep learning models in high-risk domains has intensified the need for trustworthy Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).
arXiv:2411. 05698v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown remarkable performance in image classification.
arXiv:2607. 09649v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Concept-based explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can make model reasoning more human-understandable, but concept-level outputs are not automatically trustworthy.